The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Addition u/s 68 of the Income ...

Appellate Tribunal upholds Income Tax Addition for unexplained cash credits. Lack of proof on individuals' investments led to the decision.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 1, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act for share application money received from various individuals. The company failed to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions. The Tribunal found that the company did not substantiate investments made by some individuals, leading to unexplained cash credits. While one individual provided an explanation for the investment source, lack of documentary evidence necessitated further verification by the Assessing Officer. For other individuals, insufficient income and lack of clear sources for large deposits resulted in the unexplained cash credits being upheld. The Tribunal agreed with the Assessing Officer's decision on these unexplained cash credits.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Addition u/s 68 of the Income ...

Appellate Tribunal upholds Income Tax Addition for unexplained cash credits. Lack of proof on individuals' investments led to the decision.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 1, 2024

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The...

Rejection of the books of accounts - best judgment assessment u/s 144 - addition of the sales made in cash on account of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - While the...

Unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credits u/s 68. Interest paid on such unexplained loans also added to income. Assessee's contention of repayment of loans...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing appeals, which exceeded 400 days, due to unexplained cash deposits and protective additions...

The case involved legality of assessment u/s 153A without search or Panchnama. The search warrant named the assessee company, rejecting the objection. No incriminating...

Addition u/s. 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the sale consideration for real...

Assessment u/s 153A - Addition u/s 68 - bogus unsecured loan - unexplained cash credit received from shell/paper companies under the garb of unsecured loan - The revenue...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

The assessee received cash credits which were treated as unexplained income u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

Unexplained cash credit u/s.68 - double taxation - taxing the source of investment and application of investment both - When an income is taxed / addition is made to...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions with Shri Singla...

Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit. Assessee's claim of introducing cash as capital in proprietary concern not accepted due to...

Quick Updates: