The case involved the issue of pre-deposit during the pendency ...

CESTAT ruled on pre-deposit during appeal & interest on duty refund. Stay is exception, total duty payment is norm.

Case Laws Central Excise

July 3, 2024

The case involved the issue of pre-deposit during the pendency of appeal, applicability of Section 11B and unjust enrichment, and eligibility for interest on refund of duty paid. The Appellate Tribunal held that total duty payment was the norm, with stay being an exception. Pre-deposit u/s 35F was confirmed, with deposited amounts considered as mandatory pre-deposit. The tribunal referred to legal precedents regarding pre-deposit under similar laws. The decision clarified the distinction between full and partial pre-deposit. The tribunal ruled that the amounts paid under protest qualified as pre-deposit and were not subject to Section 11B. Interest on delayed refunds was granted post-amendment.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved the issue of pre-deposit during the pendency ...

CESTAT ruled on pre-deposit during appeal & interest on duty refund. Stay is exception, total duty payment is norm.

Case Laws Central Excise

July 3, 2024

You may also like:

Adjustment of refund claim (rebate claim on export of goods) with demand stayed by the CESTAT

Stay of Refund - Refund claim under rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 – unable to utilize the credit on account of closure of their factory - grant of refund stayed - AT

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

CENVAT Credit - input - fuel - the exception to sub-rule (1) which is contained in sub-rule (2) itself contains an exception, namely, inputs intended to be used as fuel....

Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Addition u/s 40A(3) - payments in cash towards purchases - ld.AR claimed that the payments were covered under the exception of Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules, 1962,...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - export of goods on payment of duty - even after payment of all duties, it had accumulated Cenvat credit because of high rate of duty in the...

The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

Interest on pre-deposit - payment of duty after reversal of duty debited in DEPB scrips is pre-deposit OR duty payment - there cannot be any duty at all when the issue...

Recovery of erroneous refund - amount paid by the appellant’s Chennai Unit towards the pre-deposit in connection with an appeal filed arising out of order in Tuticorin...

Refund of Pre-deposit alongwith interest - Adjustment of pre-deposit with pending demand - A pre-deposit would become refundable the moment an Appellate Authority comes...

Adjudication of show cause notice (SCN) after several year - The tribunal noted the history of duty exemption, litigation, and subsequent duty imposition on resin...

Refund claim of the amount of pre- deposit - As per the cenvat credit rules, an assessee can take the cenvat credit of any duty paid on the inputs used in the...

Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

Quick Updates: