Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

The law regarding the liability of a director for an offence u/s ...


Director Liability Under Negotiable Instruments Act Requires Specific Allegations of Management Involvement.

July 11, 2024

Case Laws     Indian Laws     HC

The law regarding the liability of a director for an offence u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act committed by a company is well-established. Section 141, being a penal provision, must be strictly construed. Only directors who were in charge of the day-to-day affairs and responsible for the conduct of the company's business can be held liable. The word 'in-charge of business' implies having overall control of the day-to-day business. To establish vicarious liability, the complainant must show that the director was associated with the day-to-day affairs and management. A director cannot be accused based on a cursory statement or vague averment. The appropriate pleadings/averments will be determined case-by-case. In the present case, the complaint contained necessary averments in line with Section 141, stating that the petitioner, along with other directors, was jointly and severally responsible and in charge of the company's business and management. The petition was dismissed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Dishonor of cheque case - vicarious liability of directors u/s 138 read with Sections 141 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Court held specific, unambiguous...

  2. Dishonor of Cheque - liability of a Director of a company - vicarious liability - It is clear from the perusal of the complaint that there is no specific averment that...

  3. Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director of the Company - The petitioner, a former non-executive additional director of the accused company, contended that...

  4. Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - There are no allegations in the criminal complaints in relation to the petitioners, much-less any specific...

  5. Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of an independent director - In absence of any specific averments or allegations carving out a specific role attributable to...

  6. The petition challenged the criminal complaint filed against the petitioner u/s 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonor of cheque. The...

  7. Non-executive director's vicarious liability in a company u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act examined. For making a non-executive director liable, there must be...

  8. Dishonour of cheque - vicarious liability - liability of group companies - liability common Directors of the group, namely, Right Choice Group of Companies - Lifting of...

  9. Non-executive director's vicarious liability u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonor of cheques issued by the company examined. Specific averments and...

  10. Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of the director - appellant was in-charge of day-to-day affairs of the Company or not - The appellant argued against her...

  11. Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of the independent Director - In absence of any specific averments or allegations carving out a specific role attributable to...

  12. Offence under Section 277 - Whether all the Directors of the Company can be prosecuted for any violation of the Income Tax Act in terms by relying on the inclusive...

  13. A director of a company cannot evade vicarious liability for the offence of dishonor of cheque u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by merely claiming to be a...

  14. Petitioners, Managing Director and Director of Ms. Kudos Chemie Pvt. Ltd., sought stay of proceedings u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, invoking Section 96 of...

  15. Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of the non-executive director - This Court is convinced that the complaint does not satisfy the requirements u/s.141 of the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates