Appellant established that incidence of duty was not passed on ...

Court Allows Appeal, Grants Refund as Duty Costs Unjustly Denied Due to Misinterpretation of Pricing and Invoice Evidence.

July 13, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Appellant established that incidence of duty was not passed on to customers. Refund sanctioning authority's report confirmed duty was not mentioned on invoices issued to customers from depot. Clearances from factory to depot were stock transfers within appellant's units. Appellant bore burden of duty without collecting it from customers. Difference in clearance values was due to gold price fluctuation, not valuation issue. Adjudicating Authority and Commissioner (Appeals) erred in holding incidence of duty was passed on to customers, barring refund on unjust enrichment grounds. Appellant is eligible for refund. Order crediting amount to Consumer Welfare Fund set aside. Appeal allowed, refund to be granted to appellant.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellant established that incidence of duty was not passed on ...

Court Allows Appeal, Grants Refund as Duty Costs Unjustly Denied Due to Misinterpretation of Pricing and Invoice Evidence.

July 13, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The appellants challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) denying eligible interest on the refunded amount. The court held that interest accrued on the deposited...

Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case...

The High Court considered a case regarding refund of Input Tax Credit. The petitioner's refund application was rejected due to lack of supporting documents. The...

Recovery of dues by adjusting them against the refund amount - Delay in processing refund - In this case, the default notices were issued after the period within which...

The petitioner's denial of refund of input tax credit debited as a pre-deposit was challenged. The court held that the non-inclusion of freight and pumping charges...

Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking directions to the respondents to issue a refund of Integrated Goods & Services Tax (IGST)...

Refund of accumulated input tax credit - inverted duty (tax) structure - LPG supplies to domestic customers after bottling in cylinders - The High Court observed that,...

The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

CESTAT allowed refund of customs duty paid twice through customs broker for same import consignment. Appellant demonstrated through Bill of Entry, payment challans, and...

A legal challenge was raised regarding the requirement to pay the Social Welfare Surcharge (SWS) on imported goods when the basic customs and additional duty were...

Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

Refund of GST paid deposited by the Vendor on advance paid by the appellant since no supply was made - Return/refund of the entire advance amount - The High Court found...

Refund of pre-deposit - refund claim filed by the CHA is proper or otherwise - It is not the case that whether CHA is claiming the refund. Those are applications of...

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

Quick Updates: