Hon'ble ITAT held that assessee failed to prove business ...

ITAT: Disallowed cash purchases over Rs. 20K under 40A(3). Cash deposits treated as unexplained income. License fee addition set aside. Appeal partly allowed.

July 15, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Hon'ble ITAT held that assessee failed to prove business expediency for cash purchases exceeding Rs. 20,000 hence disallowance u/s 40A(3) was justified. Cash deposits in bank account were treated as unexplained income as assessee couldn't prove source. Addition regarding license fee paid to Excise Department was set aside for verification by AO. Assessee's appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Hon'ble ITAT held that assessee failed to prove business ...

ITAT: Disallowed cash purchases over Rs. 20K under 40A(3). Cash deposits treated as unexplained income. License fee addition set aside. Appeal partly allowed.

July 15, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT adjudicated on the following issues: 1. Cost of acquisition for computing long-term capital gains on sale of ancestral agricultural land: The assessee's...

The ITAT Delhi held that no addition u/s 68 was warranted as there was no abnormal jump in sales, with audited results and profits undisputed. The difference in cash...

The assessee, a sole proprietor running a petrol pump allotted by BPCL, deposited unexplained cash in the current bank account. The AO invoked Section 69A and made an...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Transfer of property deemed as short-term capital gain due to holding period less than 36 months, disallowing deduction u/s 54F. Additions for difference in commission...

Disallowance of cash payments in excess of prescribed limit u/s. 40A(3) - even though few payments is covered u/s. 40A(3) of the Act, because of peculiar nature of...

ITAT ruled against PCIT's revision order under s.263 regarding unaccounted cash purchases of Rs.5,83,99,000/-. The Tribunal held that where AO had already estimated...

Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit. Assessee's claim of introducing cash as capital in proprietary concern not accepted due to...

AO accepted assessee company's books of accounts and net profit disclosed therein. However, AO treated cash deposits in bank accounts during demonetization period as...

Assessee engaged in business of commission agent (Aadatia) for agricultural products. AO made addition u/s 68 treating entire cash deposits in bank account as...

The ITAT considered the issue of cash deposits and other credits in the assessee's saving bank account. The tribunal noted that the cash deposits were not made in a...

Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash purchases of the liquor from suppliers - The cash transactions, in any case, have been subjected to TCS collections etc. and are thus duly...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - cash payment - There is no case of addition of section 40A(3) with regard to purchases that were made on account of capital items - AT

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

Quick Updates: