Hon'ble ITAT held that assessee failed to prove business ...

ITAT: Disallowed cash purchases over Rs. 20K under 40A(3). Cash deposits treated as unexplained income. License fee addition set aside. Appeal partly allowed.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 15, 2024

Hon'ble ITAT held that assessee failed to prove business expediency for cash purchases exceeding Rs. 20,000 hence disallowance u/s 40A(3) was justified. Cash deposits in bank account were treated as unexplained income as assessee couldn't prove source. Addition regarding license fee paid to Excise Department was set aside for verification by AO. Assessee's appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Hon'ble ITAT held that assessee failed to prove business ...

ITAT: Disallowed cash purchases over Rs. 20K under 40A(3). Cash deposits treated as unexplained income. License fee addition set aside. Appeal partly allowed.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 15, 2024

You may also like:

The ITAT Delhi held that no addition u/s 68 was warranted as there was no abnormal jump in sales, with audited results and profits undisputed. The difference in cash...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Transfer of property deemed as short-term capital gain due to holding period less than 36 months, disallowing deduction u/s 54F. Additions for difference in commission...

Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

Disallowance of cash payments in excess of prescribed limit u/s. 40A(3) - even though few payments is covered u/s. 40A(3) of the Act, because of peculiar nature of...

The ITAT considered the issue of cash deposits and other credits in the assessee's saving bank account. The tribunal noted that the cash deposits were not made in a...

Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash purchases of the liquor from suppliers - The cash transactions, in any case, have been subjected to TCS collections etc. and are thus duly...

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - cash payment - There is no case of addition of section 40A(3) with regard to purchases that were made on account of capital items - AT

Addition u/s 68 r.w. section 115BBE - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The tribunal finds that the AO did not provide a satisfactory explanation for...

Addition as cash receipts and cash payment - the tax auditor reported these two items of cash receipt and cash payment shown under the column of loan and deposits...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) – purchase of bricks for Rs. 2,52,000/- though made in cash but each voucher was for below Rs. 20,000/- section 40A(3) will not apply - AT

Disallowance of freight expenditure u/s 40A(3) paid in Cash - As enhanced limit of ₹ 35,000/- is applicable for the payment to the transport operators and in other...

Addition u/s 40A - Cash expenditure exceeding the threshold of Rs. 20,000/- - The appellant/assessee argued that the payments made through supervisors, who were...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - depositing cash in bank account of supplier - the purpose of Section 40A(3), is only preventive and to check tax evasions and flow of...

Quick Updates: