Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

The assessee's contentions were upheld by the Tribunal regarding ...


Tribunal upholds assessee's contentions, deletes additions by AO on unexplained cash, bank statements, time deposits & u/s 68.

Case Laws     Income Tax

July 19, 2024

The assessee's contentions were upheld by the Tribunal regarding various additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal ruled that the RTGS transfer from the assessee's bank account cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposit, and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition. The Tribunal also accepted the assessee's explanation regarding the bank statements and held that no addition can be made solely based on AIR information without corroborative evidence. The addition on account of time deposits/fixed deposits was deleted, as the assessee had shown sufficient operating receipts, and the renewal of fixed deposits cannot be questioned unless the original source is doubted. The Tribunal found that the investments in land property were duly reflected in the bank statements, and the delay in cheque clearance cannot lead to an adverse inference. The addition u/s 68 was also deleted, as the assessee established the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The assessee received cash credits which were treated as unexplained income u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing appeals, which exceeded 400 days, due to unexplained cash deposits and protective additions...

  3. Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

  4. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the...

  5. Addition u/s. 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the sale consideration for real...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

  7. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The...

  8. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  9. In the ITAT Delhi case, the Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on two key issues. Firstly, regarding unexplained cash deposits u/s 68, the AO's failure to...

  10. Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

  11. Unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credits u/s 68. Interest paid on such unexplained loans also added to income. Assessee's contention of repayment of loans...

  12. Rejection of the books of accounts - best judgment assessment u/s 144 - addition of the sales made in cash on account of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - While the...

  13. The Appellate Tribunal held that the addition u/s 56(2)(vii) or 28(iv) was unjustified, as the purchase was made with consideration, cheques were given to sellers with...

  14. The assessee, a foreign company, earned network transportation fees from its Indian associated enterprise (AE), Damco India Private Limited (DIPL). The Assessing Officer...

  15. Addition u/s 68 r.w. section 115BBE - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The tribunal finds that the AO did not provide a satisfactory explanation for...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates