Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

Clandestine manufacture and clearance of Sponge Iron alleged - ...


Clandestine Sponge Iron manufacture alleged - undervaluation demand based on seized docs - MD penalty & 18,156.96 MT confiscation set aside.

Case Laws     Central Excise

July 20, 2024

Clandestine manufacture and clearance of Sponge Iron alleged - undervaluation demand calculated based on seized documents - retraction of statements - Section 9D of Central Excise Act, 1944 not followed - penalty on Managing Director set aside - 18,156.96 MT Sponge Iron confiscation set aside. Seized documents cannot be relied upon without establishing author's identity as per Section 36A. Statements alone insufficient to prove clandestine removal without corroborative evidence like unaccounted raw materials, stock discrepancies, seizures en route, excess electricity consumption, evidence of transporters/buyers and fund flow. Demands unsustainable without mandatory examination u/s 9D. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Clandestine removal - excess usage of raw material Sponge Iron, than mentioned - the entire demand is based on mere average yield of production and no concrete evidence...

  2. Clandestine manufacture and removal - sponge iron - clandestine clearance cannot be established merely on the basis of statement of the Director who has alleged coercion...

  3. Clandestine removal - Ingots - demands of duty made on account of alleged production based on the number of heats and alleged clandestine removal based on parallel...

  4. CENVAT credit - all these insurance policies which have been taken by appellant are connected with the activity of the appellant i.e. manufacturing of Hot Iron and...

  5. Excisability - Dolochar - Dolochar arises as a combination of Iron Ore, Dolomite and unburnt pieces of coal during the process of manufacture of Sponge Iron - No duty...

  6. Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

  7. Clandestine manufacture and removal - plastic molded chairs - burden of proof to establish that there was clandestine manufacture - seizure of the pen drive -...

  8. Clandestine removal - shortage of sponge iron recorded at the time of stock verification - In any case no evidence has been brought on record to allege that the goods...

  9. Clandestine Removal - mild steel ingots from sponge iron - pig iron - There is no explanation forthcoming in the impugned orders for discarding of the energy consumption...

  10. Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

  11. Clandestine removal - suppression of production, under valuation and clandestine clearance of sponge iron - The Tribunal's decision primarily focused on the...

  12. Clandestine removal of sponge iron - once the statements of the transporters and commission agent are ignored, there is nothing much left to sustain the allegation...

  13. Reversal of CENVAT Credit - iron ore fines which emerges during the course of manufacture of sponge iron ore are in unavoidable and inevitable by-product and therefore...

  14. Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

  15. Clandestine removal - suppression of production - Merely deposit of money at the time of investigation would not amount to acceptance of allegations of clandestine...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates