The period of limitation of one year does not apply when the ...

Refund claim not barred by limitation if paid under protest. Sec 27 recognizes protest payment, not vacation. Excludes penalty/fine refunds.

Case Laws Customs

July 22, 2024

The period of limitation of one year does not apply when the amount claimed as refund has been paid under protest. Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, only recognizes the fact of payment of amounts under protest and does not recognize the vacation of such protest once it is established that the amount claimed as refund was paid under protest. The provisions of Section 27 cannot be applied to refund claims for penalty and fines, as these amounts were paid under protest as per the department's direction for effecting the clearance of goods, though the order imposing the fine and penalty was challenged in appeal. Therefore, the refund claim cannot be held barred by the limitation provided in Section 27, and the impugned order rejecting the refund claim lacks merit, leading to the allowance of the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The period of limitation of one year does not apply when the ...

Refund claim not barred by limitation if paid under protest. Sec 27 recognizes protest payment, not vacation. Excludes penalty/fine refunds.

Case Laws Customs

July 22, 2024

You may also like:

The case involved a dispute u/s 27 of the Customs Act regarding refund of pre-deposits paid under protest. CESTAT held that when fines and penalties are set aside, the...

Refund claim for the amount of CVD paid - time limitation - Duty was paid under protest or not - The appellant, an importer of silk yarn and silk fabrics, filed a refund...

Refund of Excise Duty, paid under protest - The refund claim is filed within one month after passing of the second Order-in-Appeal which is dated 27.02.2018. The claim...

Refund of Additional Duty of Customs paid - to allow the limitation period to start from the date of payment of duty as prescribed under the amended notification, would...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund claim - Bar of limitation - Respondent filed refund claim consequential to the dropping of demand under adjudication order dated 27/11/2009 within 3 months -...

Yearly Claim of refund of unutilized cenvat credit - Notification number 27/2012 contemplates for filing of refund claims of unutilised Cenvat credit quarterly, but it...

Refund claim - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - Time bar - benefit of ‘payment of duty under protest’ made by the manufacturer cannot be extended to the buyer - AT

Refund of service tax - double payment of service tax was made - when service tax is paid by mistake a claim for refund cannot be barred by limitation, merely because...

Refund of Service tax - amount was paid under protest - time limitation - Tribunal held that appellants are not liable to pay service tax vide order issued on 16.11.2016...

Refund claim - service tax paid under mistake of law - time limitation - Assessee's claim to refund would not be disallowed solely because it seemed barred by limitation.

Refund claim in terms of Section 27 of the Customs Act - Rejected being time barred - Anti-dumping duty paid on PVC film - limitation prescribed under Section 27 would...

Refund claim - Bar of limitation - appellant’s refund claim was maintainable and tax paid by the appellant under misconception of law was to be refunded - AT

Refund the excess duty paid - The refund has been rejected on the ground that it is barred by limitation - When the appellant has approached the higher forum aggrieved...

Refund of excess payment of service tax - Period of limitation - the refund claims filed beyond statutory period of limitation as prescribed by the statute (Section 11B...

Quick Updates: