Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe ...


Reopening notice invalid, based on material already considered during regular assessment. Mere change of opinion. Disclosure made, not a failure.

Case Laws     Income Tax

August 2, 2024

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only based on discrepancy noticed from impounded material relevant to the year under consideration. AO during regular assessment verified the same impounded material and issued notice u/s 142(1) for explanation regarding transactions in impounded documents. AO also called for further details regarding impounded material found during survey relevant to the assessment year, explaining total difference in day-wise amount. Hence, during regular assessment, the issue of totaling difference in impounded material was considered. Therefore, it cannot be said that the impugned notice was issued based on any new tangible material having live nexus with escaped income. AO had access to impounded material during regular assessment and after processing revised return filed by assessee, impugned reopening notice is not tenable as it would amount to change of opinion. As the impugned notice was issued beyond four years and assessee made disclosure based on impounded material, it cannot be considered failure to make full and true disclosure. Decided in favor of assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reopening of assessment challenged on grounds that Assessing Officer had already considered entries related to Long/Short Term Capital Gains/Losses, Unsecured Loans,...

  2. Validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 challenged. Profit earned by trading in shares treated as unexplained credit u/s 68. Held: Petitioner disclosed all material...

  3. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court noted that the issue of disallowance under Section 14A of the Act had been thoroughly examined during the original...

  4. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons to believe - The High Court examined the submissions and found that the notice for reopening the assessment lacked jurisdiction....

  5. The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns...

  6. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO has reasons to believe that such payments which were not considered during the original assessment escaped assessment and therefore,...

  7. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of second show cause notice - The subsequent issuance of the notice cannot be said to be dropping the earlier show cause...

  8. The assessment order was challenged on the grounds of validity of reopening after four years, based on a change of opinion and borrowed satisfaction. The assessee...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond four years. The assessment was based on notes to accounts for AY 2009-10....

  11. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) had specifically called for and considered information regarding unsecured loans during the original assessment...

  12. The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the revenue authorities were invalid as there was no new tangible material or information suggesting...

  13. Validity of reopening of assessment - The High Court found that the Assessing Officer issued the notice based on the survey action on Jammu & Kashmir Bank, conducted...

  14. Assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting assessee's return, which included export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation as other business income. Subsequently,...

  15. Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates