Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

Customs Officers seized gold bars believing they were liable for ...


Gold bars wrongly seized despite proper docs. Lack of reasonable belief for smuggling at seizure time. Mere presumptions insufficient.

Case Laws     Customs

August 5, 2024

Customs Officers seized gold bars believing they were liable for confiscation under reasonable belief of smuggling. However, the gold was covered under proper documents, so there was no reasonable belief of smuggling on seizure date. Section 123 presumption was not invokable as reasonableness must be judged by circumstances at seizure time. Department failed to conclusively prove gold was smuggled, foreign origin, and re-melted with false markings. When Section 123 is not invokable and appellants disclosed legitimate purchase source, Department must prove smuggling and liability. Mere presumptions are insufficient. Confiscation and penalty on appellants not legally tenable. Commissioner (Appeals) order upholding absolute confiscation set aside by Appellate Tribunal. Appeal allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Smuggling - Gold - It is true that the conduct of the appellants was suspicious - But, the Officers did not have a reasonable belief in the first place to assert that...

  2. Smuggling - Gold Bars - Gold Biscuits - Admittedly it is a case of town seizure. Out of the 5 gold bars and 1 cut piece seized, there is foreign marking – ‘rand...

  3. Smuggling - Gold of Foreign Origin - Commissioner Of Customs (Appeals) quashed the confiscation and penalty - There were no grounds for reasonable belief at the time of...

  4. Confiscating absolutely seven gold bars having foreign make marking - Smuggling - Hyundai Verna Car - sufficient evidence to prove foreign origin goods - The Tribunal...

  5. 10kg of gold consisting of 10 gold bars, with 7 bars bearing foreign markings and 3 bars without markings, was seized along with cash from an employee of the appellant....

  6. Seizure of gold - Smuggling - chemical examiner can only give the percentage of gold in the gold bars but cannot say whether the seized goods are of foreign origin -...

  7. Appellant proved ownership of gold bars through valid invoices, discharging initial onus. Revenue failed to establish invoices unrelated to seized gold, lacking inquiry...

  8. Smuggling of the gold bars - bona fide baggage - The Tribunal found that the appellant knowingly avoided declaring the gold bars upon arrival, thus violating customs...

  9. Smuggling - Gold of foreign origin - Absolute Confiscation - town seizure - reliability of statements/retraction of statements - The tribunal highlighted inconsistencies...

  10. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  11. Smuggling - Gold Bars - reason to believe that the Gold Bars are of Foreign Origin - Absolute Confiscation - The Magistrate ought to have ordered custody of the smuggled...

  12. Absolute confiscation of seized gold - There was no reasonable belief with the DRI officers at the time of detaining/seizing the gold from appellant, the onus was upon...

  13. Smuggling - Gold - the department could not adduce any evidence whatsoever to prove that the said two gold bars were smuggled in the two countries. Therefore, the...

  14. Confiscation - town Seizure - Gold of foreign origin having inscription of 2(two) Swastika symbol - revenue has failed to prove reasonable belief that being the gold in...

  15. Seizure of gold of foreign origin, silver granules and Indian currency notes - The High Court overturned the CESTAT's decision, emphasizing that: The statements made by...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates