Blacklisting viewed as drastic remedy, orders subjected to ...

Blacklisting orders face rigorous scrutiny. Disability objective satisfaction required. Guidelines protect public interest from unethical contractors.

Case Laws Indian Laws

August 9, 2024

Blacklisting viewed as drastic remedy, orders subjected to rigorous scrutiny. Objective satisfaction required for disability created by blacklisting order. Comprehensive guidelines for debarment issued to protect public interest from non-responsible, dishonest, or illegal conduct contractors. Blacklisting debarment from dealings with concerned employer and other entities. Appellant paid Rs. 3,71,96,265 though outstanding Rs. 14,63,24,727 per Corporation. Issues between parties regarding reciprocal obligations in bid document from inception. Impugned judgment set aside, appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Blacklisting viewed as drastic remedy, orders subjected to ...

Blacklisting orders face rigorous scrutiny. Disability objective satisfaction required. Guidelines protect public interest from unethical contractors.

Case Laws Indian Laws

August 9, 2024

You may also like:

Scope of limited scrutiny - In the present case, the day on which case was converted into full scrutiny i.e. on 21.12.2016 the ld. AO on the very next day passed the...

Rectification of assessment orders to correct the errors apparent on the face of record u/s 161 of DGST GST Act, 2017. - The instruction issued by the Department of...

Scope of the Adjustment made by the CPC u/s 143(1) when scrutiny assessment made u/s 143(3) - Considering the facts that the case of the assessee was subsequently taken...

Revision u/s 263 - scope of limited scrutiny - PCIT has directed the AO to pass the assessment order afresh ignoring that when the case is selected for limited scrutiny,...

Conduct of Assessment Proceedings electronically in time-barring scrutiny cases - Order u/s 119

Remission of duty - Rule 21 of CER, 2002 - goods destroyed by fire - The satisfaction envisaged by the rule is not arbitrary satisfaction but the judicial satisfaction...

Validity of assessment framed u/s 153C - Search conducted at secret office of searched person - Definition of "Books and Books of Accounts" u/s 2(12A) includes...

Conversion of “Limited Scrutiny” into “Complete Scrutiny” - Expanding the scope of limited scrutiny assessment without necessary approval - Since the notice under...

Conversion of limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) - where the Assessing officer has taken up fresh issue without converting limited scrutiny to...

The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

Validity of converting the “limited scrutiny” into “complete scrutiny” - The tribunal found substance in the claim of the AR that the A.O had clearly exceeded his...

Scope of limited scrutiny - mandation of recording satisfaction before extending/expanding scope of scrutiny - the Assessment framed by the Assessing Officer on the...

Revision u/s 263 - merger of the order - the entire issue of limited scrutiny, reasons for selection, the Bank accounts in questions were before the ld. Pr. CIT. On this...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D in rectification proceedings u/s 154 - Mandation of recording satisfaction - Recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer under Rule...

Quick Updates: