Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
PMLA - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

The case involves a challenge to a seizure order issued u/s 8(3) ...


Seizure order challenged under PMLA 2002 not valid if investigation not done within 365 days. Court allows appeal, sets aside order.

Case Laws     Money Laundering

August 13, 2024

The case involves a challenge to a seizure order issued u/s 8(3) of PMLA 2002. The investigation, which should have been completed within 365 days as per Section 8(3)(a) of the Act, has not been concluded. The court held that since the investigation has not been completed, the order of seizure cannot continue. It was noted that if the investigation is not completed within the specified time frame, the attachment or seizure would lapse. Therefore, the impugned seizure order by the Adjudicating Authority was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Constitutional validity and interpretation of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 - procedure followed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED)...

  2. Reporting Entity under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)

  3. Money Laundering - offence punishable u/s 3 - The said definition given in Section 3 of the PMLA, 2002 was later on clarified by adding explanation and as such it does...

  4. Extension of Period of Stay beyond 365 days – Entire object and purpose of insertion of sub-section 2A in Section 35C by Section 140 of the Finance Act, 2002 (20 of...

  5. The High Court dismissed the petitions seeking to quash the criminal complaint under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The petitioners argued that the...

  6. Investigation under PMLA - There is hardly any scope to afford prior opportunity of hearing in a proceeding under PMLA. If the proposition of the applicants that, prior...

  7. Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

  8. Section 50 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 held constitutional and not violative of Articles 14, 20, and 21 of Constitution of India and Section 132 of...

  9. The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of...

  10. Challange to the bail granted by the HC - Money Laundering - scheduled offence - The High Court has neither considered the rigour of Section 45 of the PML Act, 2002 nor...

  11. The court dismissed the third bail application filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in a case involving money laundering and illegal extortion on coal...

  12. The case involves a second bail application u/s 439 Cr.P.C. for regular bail in a Money Laundering matter related to illegal levy on coal transportation. The court...

  13. Money Laundering - proceeds of crime - Jurisdiction to investigate - The Apex Court time and again has frowned upon interference into investigations conducted by the...

  14. Power to investigate under PMLA - the expression “and” occurring in Section 3 has to be construed as “or”, to give full play to the said provision so as to include...

  15. Money Laundering - proceeds of crime - attachments of the property - investigation for a period beyond three hundred and sixty five days not resulting in any proceedings...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates