Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
PMLA - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

The case involves a challenge to a seizure order issued u/s 8(3) ...


Seizure order challenged under PMLA 2002 not valid if investigation not done within 365 days. Court allows appeal, sets aside order.

August 13, 2024

Case Laws     Money Laundering     AT

The case involves a challenge to a seizure order issued u/s 8(3) of PMLA 2002. The investigation, which should have been completed within 365 days as per Section 8(3)(a) of the Act, has not been concluded. The court held that since the investigation has not been completed, the order of seizure cannot continue. It was noted that if the investigation is not completed within the specified time frame, the attachment or seizure would lapse. Therefore, the impugned seizure order by the Adjudicating Authority was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The appeals under PMLA were allowed. The freezing/attachment order would continue during the investigation period of 365 days or pendency of the case before the Court...

  2. Arrest order challenged u/s 19(3) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. Court held PMLA prevails as special enactment over general law. Section 65 allows...

  3. Cognizance of money laundering offense by Trial Court valid despite ongoing investigation. Retrospective applicability of Explanation-II to Section 44(1)(b) PMLA upheld....

  4. Reporting Entity under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)

  5. Money Laundering - offence punishable u/s 3 - The said definition given in Section 3 of the PMLA, 2002 was later on clarified by adding explanation and as such it does...

  6. Constitutional validity and interpretation of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 - procedure followed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED)...

  7. Extension of Period of Stay beyond 365 days – Entire object and purpose of insertion of sub-section 2A in Section 35C by Section 140 of the Finance Act, 2002 (20 of...

  8. The High Court dismissed the application challenging the freezing orders issued by the Enforcement Directorate u/s 17 and Section 17(1-A) of the Prevention of Money...

  9. HC affirmed ED's authority to conduct search, seizure, and account freezing operations under FEMA 1999 and PMLA 2002. Court held that interference during investigation...

  10. AT ruled against Bank's challenge to property attachment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Despite Bank's prior mortgage rights and claim as fraud victim,...

  11. Challange to the bail granted by the HC - Money Laundering - scheduled offence - The High Court has neither considered the rigour of Section 45 of the PML Act, 2002 nor...

  12. The High Court dismissed the petitions seeking to quash the criminal complaint under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The petitioners argued that the...

  13. Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

  14. Investigation under PMLA - There is hardly any scope to afford prior opportunity of hearing in a proceeding under PMLA. If the proposition of the applicants that, prior...

  15. HC quashed order relating to Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims that were time-barred under Section 16(4) of CGST Act but fell within limitation under Section 16(5)....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates