Difference between assessed income and returned income arose due ...

Loss of income due to wrong WDV calculation - Genuine mistake, no penalty imposed.

August 20, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Difference between assessed income and returned income arose due to inadvertent error in taking opening written down value (WDV) at book value instead of WDV under Income Tax Act. First Appellate Authority deleted penalty u/s 270A based on Prem Brothers Infrastructure LLP case, holding bona fide error cannot be basis for penalty. Revenue's appeal dismissed, Tribunal affirmed deletion of penalty, stating human error cannot invite penalty imposition.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Difference between assessed income and returned income arose due ...

Loss of income due to wrong WDV calculation - Genuine mistake, no penalty imposed.

August 20, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 - wrong invoice was sent by the foreign supplier - It was a genuine mistake of issuing wrong invoice which has been used...

Disallowance on account of loss on error trade - due to human error in punching the wrong scrip code, or punching of wrong quantity or in punching buy order in place of...

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

The appellants, a customs warehousing station, faced a fire incident resulting in the loss of certain goods. The customs duty amount on the lost goods was paid by the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for "non-genuine loss" on account of assessee's transactions in futures and options (F&O) was unjustified. The reasons recorded did not...

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - loss on sale of machinery - The Assessee contested the penalty, arguing that the omission of adding the loss on the sale of machinery to the...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - Though there is a remedy to revise the return but if the assessee could not revised its return of income within the period prescribed,...

The case involved penalty proceedings u/s 270A for under-reporting or misreporting of income. The appellant argued that there was no underreporting as the transaction...

Penalty proceedings u/s. 270A for underreporting of income - claim of excessive loss - Since, the assessee has neither claimed any benefit of loss against any other...

Penalty u/s 114A and 114AA of Customs Act - providing wrong information in the course of business - The penalty imposed under Section 114AA and the penalty imposed under...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

Quick Updates: