Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Companies Law - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

The NCLAT held that the requirement of obtaining a No Objection ...


NCLAT Rules No Objection Certificate Unnecessary for Revival Schemes Under IBC, Streamlining Insolvency Processes.

August 22, 2024

Case Laws     Companies Law     AT

The NCLAT held that the requirement of obtaining a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from stock exchanges under Regulation 37(1) and (2) of the LODR (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) is not applicable for schemes of arrangement for revival of companies undergoing liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). SEBI's exemption for resolution plans u/s 31 of the IBC from seeking NOC from stock exchanges was intended to facilitate time-bound CIRP process under the Code's supervision. The scheme for revival, akin to a resolution plan, complies with Section 30(2) of the IBC and Regulations 37 and 38 of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, including payment of CIRP and liquidation costs, workmen's dues, settlement value to creditors, extinguishment of liabilities, ouster of erstwhile promoters, and induction of acquirers as new promoters. Courts emphasize reviving the company's business in stakeholders' interest. The scheme offers a higher value than rejected resolution plans and liquidation value. Stock exchanges have the opportunity to raise objections before the NCLT during scheme approval.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Verification Certificate - Certificate under provisions of rule 114(4) of Income Tax Rules, 1962

  2. Initiation of CIRP - period of limitation - whether the issuance of Recovery Certificate would not trigger the right to sue. - A liability in respect of a claim arising...

  3. Rule 48 of the NCLAT Rules clearly stipulates service of notice on the other side, pursuant to issuance of notice by the NCLAT in the appeal, regardless of supply of...

  4. The NCLAT erred in invoking its inherent powers u/r 11 of the NCLAT Rules 2016 to approve a settlement between the second respondent and the Corporate Debtor,...

  5. NCLAT addressed the computation of limitation periods for filing appeals under IBC. The tribunal held that while the 30-day limitation period under Section 61 can be...

  6. Maintainability of appeal before NCLAT - applicability of time limitation - A sleight of interpretation of procedural rules cannot be used to defeat the substantive...

  7. GST rates for Composition Scheme with CGST Rules, 2017 aligned between notification and rules.

  8. Import of Pigeon Peas from Mozambique - When the 1st respondent had issued the No Objection Certificate in favour of the petitioner, they cannot withdraw the No...

  9. Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS) - refusal to issue the Discharge Certificate - The Scheme being a piece of reformative legislation,...

  10. Maintainability of application u/s 7 - time limitation - The Appellate Tribunal referenced recent Supreme Court judgments, affirming that a liability arising from a...

  11. NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the auction notice and denied stay of the impugned order. The Tribunal found no procedural flaws in the liquidation process,...

  12. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the corporate debtor against the order admitting the application u/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) filed by the...

  13. Auction of assets by the Bank - sale certificate issued with encumbrances - The petitioner Bank filed the present writ petition seeking a direction against the...

  14. Benefit of exemption - certificate of origin - The rejection of certificate of origin is bad as it was a case of minor discrepancy and was fit to be ignored in terms of...

  15. The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging a Scheme of Arrangement between ICICI Bank Ltd and ICICI Securities Ltd. The Tribunal held that appellants lacked standing to...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates