Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

The case pertains to the issue of addition in the hands of a ...


Advance Payment for Land: Tribunal Rules No Additional Tax for Individual When HUF Already Assessed.

August 29, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The case pertains to the issue of addition in the hands of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) versus an individual for advance money paid for the purchase of land. The key points are: The assessee argued that since the payments were made by the Darshan Kumar HUF, no separate addition should be made in the hands of Darshan Kumar as an individual. The Tribunal held that no addition was required as the assessee demonstrated that the name of the seller and property description matched the legal notice. The synopsis clarified that the deal was for Rs. 14 lacs per acre as per the agreement, and an addition of Rs. 20 lacs had already been made in the hands of Darshan Kumar HUF for the assessment year 2006-07. Therefore, since the addition had already been considered in the HUF's hands, it was not liable to be made again based on a wrong interpretation of the facts. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The ITAT held that where the assessee entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and complied with its...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

  3. Capital Gains - Whether land belonged to the ''HUF'' and not to the assessee? - there was no mentioned that the land was being sold by the assessee as Karta of 'HUF' -...

  4. Advance tax payment obligation does not apply when assessee claims agricultural land sale proceeds are exempt u/s 2(14). CIT(Appeals) should admit appeal for...

  5. Deduction u/s 54B - LTCG - Agriculture land purchased in the name Individual on behalf of HUF - Sale of agriculture land owned by HUF - In substance, the HUF is owner of...

  6. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  7. Interest u/s 234C - interest for deferment of advance tax - If on a particular due date for payment of advance tax, the facts show that there is no liability to pay...

  8. Manual filing of applications for Advance Ruling and appeals before Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling

  9. Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

  10. ITAT reversed penalty imposed under s271I for non-submission of Form 15CA/15CB regarding overseas transactions. Following precedent in M/s Vinay Diamond matter, tribunal...

  11. Assessment in the hands of the non exisiting HUF - The words 'hitherto assessed as undivided' [u/s 171(1)] are very important while considering the section. If the...

  12. Scope of Advance Ruling - Validity of Ruling dated 20/01/2021 - The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) declared the advance ruling void ab initio under section 104 of...

  13. The applicant had suppressed material facts from the Authority for Advance Ruling by mis-declaring that the issue was not pending in any other proceedings, when in fact,...

  14. Adjustment of advance / excess payment of service tax without intimation - Rule 6(4A) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 - case is covered by Rule 6(1A)according to which the...

  15. Revision u/s 263 - denial of deduction u/s 54 in the hands of Individual - Partition of HUF or not - reading of sub- section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 makes it...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates