Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Delayed adjudication of show cause notice without reasonable ...


Unreasonable delay in issuing notice & finalizing assessments - classification dispute spanned years despite tribunal's directives.

Case Laws     Central Excise

September 2, 2024

Delayed adjudication of show cause notice without reasonable cause - Delay in finalizing assessments and issuing demand - Classification of goods under appropriate tariff item - Finalization of provisional assessment made earlier u/r 9B - Period of dispute spanning multiple years - Held that there was no justification for the Department to delay issuing show cause notice for nearly one year after Tribunal's order directing conclusion of de novo proceedings within four months. Revenue failed to finalize assessment within normal period, Tribunal intervened directing completion within four months, but proceedings took 14 months violating time frame. Catena of judgments consider delayed adjudication without reasonable cause as ground for setting aside order. Delayed finalization of 14 months against Tribunal's direction of four months is fatal, impugned order set aside, appeal allowed. Once classification issue decided, no action taken for 22 years to finalize assessment as per demand raised u/s 11A, demand raised after 14 years without finalizing provisional assessment.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Unreasonable delay in completion of reassessment - It is thus clear that even if the notice was issued within the prescribed period of limitation,...

  2. The Orissa High Court considered a case involving inordinate delay in adjudicating a show cause notice issued in 2008 related to a dispute from 2004-05. The court held...

  3. Pre-existing dispute regarding machine's performance and delayed delivery existed before demand notice. Respondent provided evidence of documented communication with...

  4. Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

  5. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court noted that the issue of disallowance under Section 14A of the Act had been thoroughly examined during the original...

  6. The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

  7. Classification of goods - In any case all the show cause notices were issued only on and after 30.08.1995, raising a classification dispute, after having approved the...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

  9. The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

  10. Validity of Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151 - According to Petitioners, the notice could have been issued only by the Faceless Assessing...

  11. Maintainability of writ petition - alternative and efficacious mechanism - Inordinate delay in issue of Show cause notice (around 16 years) - Issuance of Global...

  12. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only...

  13. GST dispute involving misclassification of two-wheeler seats - petitioner challenged bunching of show cause notices for multiple assessment years - HC allowed splitting...

  14. Validity of Show cause notice (SCN) u/s 74 - Under Section 74(1) notice is an independent notice to be issued in DRC-01, whereas the notice under Section 74(5) was to be...

  15. Initiation of CIRP - pre-existence of dispute - There was no dispute existing prior to the first demand notice and only disputes raised prior to the first demand notice...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates