The High Court quashed and set aside the demand raised u/s 154 ...

Quashed Income Tax Demand Without Notice/Order; Inquiry Ordered on Erring Officer.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 20, 2024

The High Court quashed and set aside the demand raised u/s 154 for the Assessment Year 2013-2014 appearing on the petitioner's portal and the computation sheet dated 31st March 2021. The respondent's counsel informed the Court that the demand was uploaded by the erstwhile Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax on the portal, but the Department does not have any file or document to show that any notice was issued u/s 154 or an order was passed. The Court directed the respondents to remove the pending demand from the Income Tax Portal pertaining to the petitioner within two weeks. Additionally, the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai was directed to conduct an inquiry by an officer not below the rank of Additional Commissioner to ascertain how such a demand was uploaded and take necessary action against any erring officer if negligence or lapse is found.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court quashed and set aside the demand raised u/s 154 ...

Quashed Income Tax Demand Without Notice/Order; Inquiry Ordered on Erring Officer.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 20, 2024

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to procedural irregularities. The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings without verifying information and the...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer cannot arbitrarily reduce agricultural income and add it as income from other sources based on mere...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner having jurisdiction over transfer pricing matters has been empowered, effective April 1, 2022, to invoke revisionary action...

Order under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 - Order-Instruction

Validity of SCN - SCN suffers from incurable deficiency - Demand raised solely on the basis of Income Tax data shared by the Income Tax authorities - CESTAT found that...

Recovery of demand - initiation of Garnishee proceedings - The assessment order and the demand does not remain merely a piece of paper, unless an assessee gets relief by...

In light of the search material, the course of action should have been taken u/s 153C instead of Section 148. The Assessing Officer erred in invoking reassessment...

The High Court quashed the summary order issued under the GST Act without a detailed order, finding it a violation of principles of natural justice. The court observed...

AO has passed the impugned order under section 220(2) without giving effect to the order of the CIT(A). It appears that the Assessing Officer has deliberately not passed...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

The High Court examined whether proper show cause notices were issued before passing impugned orders u/s 73(9) of the State GST Act. It held that the summary of show...

Proper authority / Jurisdiction to launch Prosecution Proceedings - It is the contention of the Revenue that the Deputy Director of Income Tax is a senior officer and...

Order of cancellation of registration passed without giving reasons, appeals dismissed u/s 107 of GST Act. Appellate Authority's dismissal prevents revisional powers u/s...

Powers of CIT(A) to pass any stay order - Appellate Commissioner has got power to modify or set aside or pass any order regarding the demand, that goes without saying...

Quick Updates: