Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The case pertains to the classification of imported goods, ...


Tribunal Rules Fork/Yoke Gear Shift as Gear Box Parts, Corrects Misclassification, Imposes 10% Duty.

September 21, 2024

Case Laws     Customs     AT

The case pertains to the classification of imported goods, specifically Fork/Yoke 5th and reverse gear shift (parts of motor vehicles), under the appropriate Customs Tariff Heading (CTH). The appellant argued for classification under CTH 84831099, considering the goods as 'Transmission Shafts,' while the adjudicating authority classified them under CTH 8708400 as parts of motor vehicle gear boxes. The Tribunal held that although the imported goods are not transmission shafts or gear boxes themselves, they are assembly components located inside the gear box assembly. As per Note 2(e) of Section XVII, parts/components of gear boxes are covered under CTH 8708, precisely 87084000. The goods are not integral parts of engines or motors but are solely used as part of the transmission assembly, which are parts of motor vehicles of HSN 8701 to 8705. Additionally, as per GRI 3(c), when goods cannot be classified by other rules, they should be classified under the heading occurring last in numerical order, which in this case is 8708. Therefore, the imported goods (Fork and Yoke 5th) are rightly classifiable under 87084000, attracting BCD at 10%. The appellant's incorrect classification under CTH 84831099 led to evasion of BCD to the extent of.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The appellant incorrectly classified imported Fork/Yoke 5th and reverse gear shift components (motor vehicle parts) under CTH 84831099 as "Transmission Shafts" rather...

  2. Duty demand - Insurance claim received against damaged gear boxes - gear box still lying in the factory - demand set aside - AT

  3. Transfer of unutilized credit - shifting of a factory - a shifted unit if dealt discriminately under Rule 10(1) of CENVAT credit Rules, 2004, use of the word shifts in...

  4. Classification of goods - Marine engines, Marine gear boxes and Marine generator supplied by the applicant to dealers of shipyard manufacturers are used as Parts of...

  5. CENVAT credit - fabrication of support structures - Boiler Parts, Silo System, Boiler Radiation Hopper, Turbine Air Unit, EOT Crane, Hook Conveyor, Materials Handling...

  6. Method of valuation - Rule 11 is adopted when the situation is not covered by any of the other methods of valuation prescribed from Rule 4 to 10A. The method of...

  7. CENVAT Credit - transfer of unutilized credit, on shifting of factory - Transfer of unutilized credit also denied on the ground that appellants have shifted on inputs...

  8. Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

  9. Valuation of export goods - While the rejection of the transaction value under Rule 8 by the lower authority is correct, determining the value under Rule 6, ignoring...

  10. Revocation of courier registration of appellant - The tribunal observed misdeclaration of the quantity and misclassification of goods. - This judgment underscores the...

  11. Validity of changes brought in Rule 6(3) (i) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - the Tribunal erred in not appreciating the significant change brought in Rule 6(3) of Cenvat...

  12. CESTAT ruled communication modules imported for smart meters are properly classifiable under CTI 8517 70 90 as parts of communication hubs, not under CTI 9028 90 10/90...

  13. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - the AO has not computed any disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(i) and Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Rules and only under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of...

  14. Misclassification and Wrongful Claim of MEIS Benefits - Exports of quilts containing cotton/polyester - Levy of penalties - The CESTAT found the appellant guilty of...

  15. Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates