The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority failed to ...

Power supplier can cut off electricity if dues unpaid during insolvency, setting aside contrary order.

Case Laws IBC

September 24, 2024

The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority failed to consider the amendments to Section 14 of the IBC introduced by Act 1 of 2020. The impugned order conflicted with the legislative scheme u/s 14(1) Explanation and Section 14(2-A). These provisions allow termination, suspension or interruption of supply of goods or services critical to preserving the Corporate Debtor's value if dues arising during the moratorium period are unpaid. The protection u/s 14(1) is subject to no default in payment of current dues. Section 14(2-A prohibits interruption of such supply only if the RP considers it critical for preserving value and managing operations as a going concern, except when moratorium dues are unpaid. The NCLAT set aside the impugned order as legally unsustainable and allowed the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority failed to ...

Power supplier can cut off electricity if dues unpaid during insolvency, setting aside contrary order.

Case Laws IBC

September 24, 2024

You may also like:

Appellant, as purchaser of asset, not liable for past electricity dues of Corporate Debtor (CD). New electricity connection obtainable on payment of statutory dues,...

Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

During CIRP period, RP is responsible for discharging pending payments including maintenance charges and electricity dues as per statutory construct of IBC and RERA Act....

Deduction u/s 80IA - quantum of profits and gains of the eligible business - Scope of expression “market value” - The market value of the power supplied by the assessee...

Set off of brought forward business loss - mistakes in previous years for not claiming benefit of set-off - 8 years time limit provided in the statute - The ITAT found...

Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS) - The cut-off date of 30.06.2019 is applicable only in the eventualities which are covered under Rules...

Cut-off Time for Determining Minimum Threshold of Margins to be Collected from Clients

Disallowance of set off of Loss - sale of equity shares (STT) - short-term capital gains (STCG) on sale of derivatives and short-term capital loss (STCL) - The Tribunal...

Set-off of current year losses against the addition made u/s 68 - going through sub-Section (2) of Section 115BBE of the Act, the words “set off of any loss” appearing...

Mode and manner of set off of loss - loss from one head set off against other head of income - business loss should be first set off against income from house property...

Set off of loss brought forward losses - conditions of 51% shareholding - the assessee is not seeking carry forward of losses to be set off but the assessee is seeking...

Set off of losses with the surrendered income - the restriction shall apply to assessment year 2017-18 onwards. Accordingly, for the year under consideration, there is...

Set off of loss incurred on sale of polished diamond goods against deemed income assessed u/s. 69A - set off against the income declared during the course of search -...

Area Based exemption in Kutch district - admissibility of exemptions for goods manufactured using plant and machinery installed after the cut-off date of 31.12.2005. -...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed errors in capital gain computation. The Assessee's claim of ₹ 859,680 was accepted over the AO's ₹ 791,221. An application u/s 154...

Quick Updates: