Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The appellant provided two services - servicing of motor ...


Amusement Park Taxable Post-2015, Tribunal Annuls Rs. 1.73 Crore Demand Citing Time-Bar and Procedure Errors.

September 28, 2024

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

The appellant provided two services - servicing of motor vehicles and running an amusement park. The amusement park service was exempt from service tax until 1.6.2015. After that, it became taxable but the appellant did not pay service tax, claiming it was covered under the negative list or exemption. However, the tribunal held that the amusement park service was not covered under the negative list or exemption after 1.6.2015 and hence taxable. Regarding the time limitation, the tribunal held that since the appellant had a bona fide belief of non-taxability and the revenue did not scrutinize the returns, the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked. The demand for short payment of service tax under repairs and maintenance services was also time-barred. The tribunal set aside the confirmed demand of Rs. 72,94,797/- towards reversal of CENVAT credit on merits, relying on court rulings that revenue cannot demand reversal without asking for proportionate reversal. The total confirmed demand of Rs. 1,73,60,105/- was set aside due to limitation. The appeal was allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than...

  2. CESTAT allowed appeal against multiple service tax demands totaling Rs.1.83 crores. Primary demands included non-reversal of CENVAT credit on exempted services (Rs.1.00...

  3. Exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - Threshold limit of Rs. 1 Crore - The Appellate Tribunal found that the appellant's gross receipts, when considering certain fee receipts...

  4. The assessee, a domestic company, contested the tax rate applied by the authorities for the assessment year 2018-19. The Finance Act, 2017 introduced a concessional tax...

  5. Direct tax collections for FY 2023-24 as of 17.06.2023 show net collections of Rs. 3,79,760 crore, a growth of 11.18% compared to the preceding year. - Gross collections...

  6. The CESTAT held that the extended period of limitation invoked for levying service tax was unsustainable as there was no wilful suppression of facts by the appellant....

  7. Classification of service - rate of GST - Amusement services in Amusement Park - giving access right to visitor for individual joy rides in their amusement park -...

  8. Classification of manufactured goods - rate of GST - amusement park ride karts commonly known as Go-karts - the 'amusement park ride karts' supplied by the applicant...

  9. Jurisdiction of Single Member Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Monetary limit Rs.50 lakhs for hearing Appeal - In the present case, the assessee returned...

  10. The HC quashed the impugned order dated 14.12.2023 for violation of principles of natural justice. The respondent failed to issue a proper and prior show cause notice...

  11. Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

  12. The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not...

  13. Demand of Service tax - out of total income parking of Rs. 3,88,45,204/- an amount of Rs. 9,63,645/- only pertains to the monthly parking income in respect of parking...

  14. Rate of GST - services by way of amusement facility - dictionaries say that a park is a large part of land used for a particular purpose - the services/activities...

  15. Levy of penalty - period of limitation for raising demand - the Tribunal has to first judge as to whether the case of the assessee is covered by proviso below...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates