Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

The assessee developed a Mechanised Coal Handling System as per ...


Mechanised Coal Handling System qualifies for tax deduction; Tribunal rules facility part of Kakinada port infrastructure.

October 1, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

The assessee developed a Mechanised Coal Handling System as per an agreement with KSPL, a Special Purpose Company of ISPL, which had an agreement with the Government of Andhra Pradesh. The assessee obtained a certificate from the port authority certifying that the infrastructure facility developed for coal handling is part of the Kakinada deep water port's infrastructure. Although the second condition was relaxed by the CBDT Circular, the assessee provided a letter from KSPL stating that upon expiry of the concession period, the structures constructed by KSPL or its subcontractors shall become the property of the Government of Andhra Pradesh without any obligation to reimburse. The Mechanised Coal Handling Terminal Installation of the assessee is to be taken over by the Government of Andhra Pradesh at the end of the concession period. The permission obtained from the customs authority is deemed to be the approval granted by the competent authority of the Central Government, as per the Madras High Court decision in A.L. Logistics Private Limited, affirmed by the Supreme Court in Container Corporation of India Limited. The Tribunal was justified in allowing the assessee's appeal for deduction u/s 80IA(4), as the assessee satisfied the prescribed conditions.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Deduction u/s 80IA(4) - profit-linked incentive - infrastructural facility forms part of the Port - Assessee had obtained the permission from Custom Authorities for...

  2. Deduction u/s 80P - interest income - The tribunal noted that section 80P(2)(a)(i) allows deduction for cooperative societies engaged in banking or providing credit...

  3. Input tax Credit - Coal is a raw material for manufacturing of cement or not - in the present case, the coal used in the process of manufacture of cement is indeed an...

  4. The appellate tribunal addressed two main issues regarding the non-payment of service tax by the appellant. Firstly, it examined the non-payment of service tax on ground...

  5. The appellant, a coal handling contractor, was allowed to adjust the excess service tax paid on account of credit notes issued to service receivers for quality and...

  6. Classification of services - rate of GST - coal handling and Distribution charges - The supply of coal done through a separate purchase order and the supply of Coal...

  7. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  8. Provision of facilities/amenities by units under Rule 11(5) of the SEZ Rules

  9. E-way bill Rules - Rule 138D as amended - Facility for uploading information regarding detention of vehicle

  10. Deduction u/s 80IA - ICD - Inland port - infrastructure facilities - deduction allowed - HC

  11. The assessee claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act for interest income earned on deposits with a Cooperative Bank. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A)...

  12. Levy of service tax - bowling alley income - scope of ‘amusement facility’ - The case involved a dispute regarding the taxability of income from a bowling alley operated...

  13. The Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamil Nadu addressed the issue of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for a Rotary parking system. The ruling clarified that the car parking system,...

  14. Regarding the deduction u/s 80IA, the Tribunal affirmed that ground handling and cargo handling services provided by the assessee were covered within the scope of...

  15. Liability of Service Tax on GTA service - Reverse Charge - Appellant being agent / intermediatory - SECL was the consignor and buyers of the coal were consignees and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates