The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related ...

Supreme Court limits lookback period for related party transactions under IBC to 2 years, non-related parties 1 year.

Case Laws IBC

October 18, 2024

The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related party transactions u/s 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is two years before the insolvency commencement date, while for non-related parties, it is one year. If the outstanding amount pertains to a period beyond two years prior to the CIRP commencement date for a related party transaction, relief u/s 43 of the IBC would not be available. However, alternative actions, including u/s 66 of the IBC, may be pursued. The NCLAT order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related ...

Supreme Court limits lookback period for related party transactions under IBC to 2 years, non-related parties 1 year.

Case Laws IBC

October 18, 2024

You may also like:

CIRP proceedings - Financial Creditors - Related party - while the default rule under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is that only those financial creditors that are...

CIRP - discrimination of Related Party Financial or Operational Creditor - IBC treats related parties as a separate category for specified purposes, excluding from the...

The Appellant, a related party unsecured financial creditor, challenged the resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority,...

CIRP - Relating parties - As on the date of it becoming a part of the CoC, Respondent No. 2 was purely a Financial Creditor of the Corporate Debtor and hence, it cannot...

Preferential Transaction or Fraudulent Transaction - creation of the security interest by way of mortgage - The Hon’ble Supreme Court has thus held that if there is a...

Disallowance towards Client Maintenance Charges - ‘related party’ - ICICI Bank Ltd. does not fall in the definition of ‘related party’ in terms of Section 40A(2)(b) of...

TP Adjustment - US Transactions non US Transactions - scope of MAP agreement - It would be better to refer to the settlement arrived between the competent authority of...

Transfer pricing adjustment to international transactions - Non-satisfaction of conditions prescribed u/r 10B(4) for using multiple year data. Assessee required to...

CIRP - Preferential Transactions or not - related transaction or not - Transaction within look bak period - such transactions are carried with intent to defraud...

Addition u/s 40A(2)(b) - purchases made by the assessee from related party - The department itself having accepted the price/value of the impugned transaction in the...

Preferential, undervalued and fraudulent transactions - Related party transactions - It is amply clear that the Option Agreements I & II are preferential and undervalued...

Proceedings initiated u/s.201(1) & 201(1A) - Period of limitation - retrospective effect of amendments - period extended from 2 years to 6 years - The provisions of...

Valuation - undervaluation - “Polo” and “Vento” models of their car - related party transaction - interconnected undertakings - Mutuality of Interest - It is found that...

Valuation - related party transaction - The transaction of ₹ 5 lakhs as loan on payment of interest cannot be the reason for holding partnership and private...

Valuation (Central Excise) - Sale to related parties - the price to the related person cannot be called a non-commercial price since the same was higher than the price...

Quick Updates: