The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related ...

Supreme Court limits lookback period for related party transactions under IBC to 2 years, non-related parties 1 year.

October 18, 2024

Case Laws IBC AT

The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related party transactions u/s 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is two years before the insolvency commencement date, while for non-related parties, it is one year. If the outstanding amount pertains to a period beyond two years prior to the CIRP commencement date for a related party transaction, relief u/s 43 of the IBC would not be available. However, alternative actions, including u/s 66 of the IBC, may be pursued. The NCLAT order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related ...

Supreme Court limits lookback period for related party transactions under IBC to 2 years, non-related parties 1 year.

October 18, 2024

Case Laws IBC AT

You may also like:

CIRP proceedings - Financial Creditors - Related party - while the default rule under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is that only those financial creditors that are...

CIRP - discrimination of Related Party Financial or Operational Creditor - IBC treats related parties as a separate category for specified purposes, excluding from the...

The Appellant, a related party unsecured financial creditor, challenged the resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority,...

Preferential Transaction or Fraudulent Transaction - creation of the security interest by way of mortgage - The Hon’ble Supreme Court has thus held that if there is a...

CIRP - Relating parties - As on the date of it becoming a part of the CoC, Respondent No. 2 was purely a Financial Creditor of the Corporate Debtor and hence, it cannot...

Resolution Professional's decision to remove appellant from Committee of Creditors upheld by NCLAT. The appellant, Hari Vitthal Mission, was determined to be a related...

Transfer pricing adjustment to international transactions - Non-satisfaction of conditions prescribed u/r 10B(4) for using multiple year data. Assessee required to...

CIRP - Preferential Transactions or not - related transaction or not - Transaction within look bak period - such transactions are carried with intent to defraud...

TP Adjustment - US Transactions non US Transactions - scope of MAP agreement - It would be better to refer to the settlement arrived between the competent authority of...

Disallowance towards Client Maintenance Charges - ‘related party’ - ICICI Bank Ltd. does not fall in the definition of ‘related party’ in terms of Section 40A(2)(b) of...

Proceedings initiated u/s.201(1) & 201(1A) - Period of limitation - retrospective effect of amendments - period extended from 2 years to 6 years - The provisions of...

Preferential, undervalued and fraudulent transactions - Related party transactions - It is amply clear that the Option Agreements I & II are preferential and undervalued...

Addition u/s 40A(2)(b) - purchases made by the assessee from related party - The department itself having accepted the price/value of the impugned transaction in the...

The NCLAT set aside the CIRP initiated by Respondent No. 2 against Respondent No. 1, holding it to be collusive and for purposes other than insolvency resolution....

Valuation - undervaluation - “Polo” and “Vento” models of their car - related party transaction - interconnected undertakings - Mutuality of Interest - It is found that...

Quick Updates: