The summary focuses on the refund claim rejection based on the ...

Refund Rejection Overturned: Eligible for TRAN-1 Credit Despite Technical Non-Declaration in Service Tax Returns.

October 21, 2024

Case Laws Service Tax AT

The summary focuses on the refund claim rejection based on the ground that the amount paid under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) is not admissible u/r 9(1)(bb) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 and was hence ineligible for transition as input tax credit u/s 142(8)(a) of CGST Act. It highlights that Rule 9(1)(e), not Rule 9(1)(bb), is applicable for RCM payments, and credit cannot be denied, citing the POLYGENTA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. case. Regarding transition of credit, it states that u/ss 142 and 140 of the CGST Act, the appellant was eligible for TRAN-1 credit, and the rejection citing non-declaration in Service Tax returns was hyper-technical. Section 142(8)(b) mandates refunding eligible credit in cash. The Adfert Technologies case upheld transitional credit as a vested right. Consequently, the impugned order rejecting the refund claim was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The summary focuses on the refund claim rejection based on the ...

Refund Rejection Overturned: Eligible for TRAN-1 Credit Despite Technical Non-Declaration in Service Tax Returns.

October 21, 2024

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - rejection of refund on the ground that credit was transferred to GST regime through TRAN-1 - it is not a case that the appellant has...

Appellant eligible for refund of Rs. 1,11,37,766/- unutilized Cenvat credit u/s 142(3) CGST Act despite inadvertent non-carry forward to TRAN-1. Procedural lapses cannot...

Entitlement for refund of input credit in cash, which was neither transitioned in accordance with TRAN-1 (GST) procedure into the new regime nor got reflected in the...

Input Tax Credit was stated to be erroneously availed without filing form TRAN-1 - This Court finds that the show cause notice was issued on the premise that the...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - In the present case, the appellant would be eligible to avail credit but for the introduction of GST law. The said right cannot be frustrated...

Filing of Form TRAN-1 - transitional credit - petitioner has committed mistake due to technical/system error and has failed in filing /uploading a declaration...

Filing of form GST TRAN-1 - transitional credit - The petitioner is entitled to get one more chance to submit the declaration in Form GST TRAN-1 as the petitioner could...

Denial of refund claimed u/s 142(3) of CGST Act for service tax paid under RCM was incorrect. Rule 9(1)(e) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 applies, not Rule 9(1)(bb),...

Transitional credit - Carry forward of Input Tax Credit - Non filing or their TRAN-1 or revised TRAN-1 within the stipulated period - the reasoning of the learned single...

Refund of accumulated and unutilized CENVAT credit - export of output services - rejection of the refund on the ground that the appellants have not debited the CENVAT...

The High Court dismissed the writ petition. The petitioner, being a registered person not liable for registration before the appointed day of 01.07.2017, sought...

Transitional Credit - TRAN-1 - As a matter of fact, the provisions of GST Act also does not provide for lapsing of the credit, which could not be successfully...

Refund of unutilised CENVAT Credit - Once it is held that the appellant has rightly taken cenvat credit and the same is lying in their books un-utilised as on...

Input Tax Credit - seeking permission to file TRAN-1 Form, either online or offline - This Court directs the respondents to permit the petitioner either submit the...

Seeking permission for submission of revised FORM GST-TRAN-1 return electronically - permission to petitioner to tender the revised FORM GST TRAN-1 form manually to the...

Quick Updates: