Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of ...


Denial of refund quashed for lack of personal hearing; remanded for reconsideration after due process.

Case Laws     GST

October 26, 2024

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of natural justice. The show cause notices allowed 15 days for response, which petitioner complied with, but hearing was allegedly held before reply. No clear evidence of hearing intimation existed. Rule 92(3) requires reasonable opportunity for hearing after reply to show cause notice. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration of refund application, upholding principles of fair play.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Order quashed due to violation of natural justice principles by not granting proper opportunity for personal hearing. Excess input tax credit availed on inputs subject...

  2. The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not given a personal hearing despite the offer in the first notice. The petitioner's claim of...

  3. Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

  4. Section 264 revision application concerning long-term capital gain (LTCG) on extinguishment of shares due to loss arising from NCLT order. Petitioner's claim for loss on...

  5. The High Court found a violation of natural justice as no opportunity for personal hearing was provided before passing an order u/s 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act,...

  6. Recovery of dues by adjusting them against the refund amount - Delay in processing refund - In this case, the default notices were issued after the period within which...

  7. Interpretation of statute - word ‘or’ is used in section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017 - opportunity of personal hearing was not afforded - Relying on statutory...

  8. The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural justice, wherein the petitioner's right to an opportunity for personal hearing, as provided under the law,...

  9. Validity of reopening of assessment - Re-opening notice u/s 148A(d) - personal hearing refused - the High court concluded that Section 148A(b) does not mandate a...

  10. Refund of CENVAT Credit - alleged lack of nexus - The procedure for claiming such refund, enshrined in notification no. 27/2012-Central Excise Act, 1944 (NT) dated 18th...

  11. Denial of specific request for personal hearing - The High Court noted that the petitioner had indeed expressed a legitimate difficulty in availing the opportunity for a...

  12. The court held that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner...

  13. The High Court examined a case involving the recovery of an erroneous refund due to an inverted duty structure. The Court found that the show cause notice lacked...

  14. The petition raised issues regarding the maintainability of the appeal u/s 107 of the UPGST Act, 2017, violation of Section 75(4) of the Act, and denial of opportunity...

  15. The High Court reviewed an assessment order challenged for being unreasoned. The Court found that the order lacked proper reasoning as it confirmed the tax proposal...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates