Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that surcharge is ...


No surcharge if total income is below Rs 50 lacs, rules Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Case Laws     Income Tax

November 7, 2024

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that surcharge is not leviable when the total income is less than Rs. 50 lacs. The Assessing Officer had contended that since the assessee's tax liability would fall under the maximum marginal rate, surcharge would apply as per section 2(29). However, the assessee argued that as per the Finance Bill, 2022, surcharge is applicable only when the total income exceeds Rs. 50 lacs. The ITAT held that since the assessee's total income was Rs. 6,73,590/-, which is less than Rs. 50 lacs, levying surcharge would not be applicable. Consequently, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to delete the surcharge levied on the assessee Trust.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. This order u/s 119(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 specifies the monetary limits for income-tax authorities to exercise their powers of reduction or waiver of interest...

  2. Income–tax (10th Amendment) Rules, 2018 - Form of appeal to the Appellate Tribunal

  3. The issue pertains to the disallowance of excess Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit u/s 115JAA and whether the amount of surcharge and education cess should be reduced...

  4. Contravention of sections 18(2) and 18(3) read with section 64(2) of FERA, 1973 established. Company failed to recover export dues without RBI permission or extension....

  5. Jurisdiction of Single Member Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Monetary limit Rs.50 lakhs for hearing Appeal - In the present case, the assessee returned...

  6. In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

  7. Sub-section (1) in Section 5 amended to not levy integrated tax on Extra Neutral Alcohol used for manufacturing alcoholic liquor for human consumption. Section 6A...

  8. Mandatory filing of ITR - In case the turnover exceeds ₹ 60 Lacs (10 Lacs in case of profession) or TDS exceeds ₹ 25,000 or aggregate deposits in saving...

  9. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  10. Reduction of cost imposed on Income Tax officers - they have acted arbitrarily, illegally without jurisdiction, caused harrassment to the petitioner and abused power...

  11. Appellate Tribunal reduced penalty imposed on company u/s 50 of FERA, 1973 from Rs.2 crores to Rs.2.5 lakhs for contravention regarding two foreign exchange remittances...

  12. Reopening of assessment beyond three years requires sanction from Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, whereas the assessee obtained sanction from Principal...

  13. The assessing officer (AO) made additions to the assessee's income based on alleged bogus purchases and unexplained investments. The key points are: Addition of Rs....

  14. The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

  15. Tribunal was right in confirming the set-off of MAT Credit under Section 115JAA brought forward from earlier years against tax on total income including surcharge and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates