Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that u/r 11UA(2) of the Income Tax Rules, ...


Share premium received on issue of shares below fair market value: Assessee's choice of valuation method binding.

Case Laws     Income Tax

November 15, 2024

The High Court held that u/r 11UA(2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, the assessee has the option to choose between the Net Asset Value method or the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method for computing the fair market value for the applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. Once the assessee exercises this option, the Assessing Officer cannot question the applicability or computation of the fair market value using the chosen method, even during regular assessment proceedings. The Assessing Officer cannot reopen the assessment merely because the valuation under one method is lower than the other method chosen by the assessee, as this does not constitute an escapement of income. The court opined that the Assessing Officer cannot assume jurisdiction to reopen the assessment to verify the veracity and computation under the DCF method on the ground that the assessee did not fulfill the projected growth in subsequent years, as no assessee can accurately predict future growth at the time of making projections.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Section 56(2)(viib) deals with the consideration received by a company for issue of shares at a premium. The assessee company issued equity shares at a premium, which...

  2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the addition made u/s 56(2)(viib) for the difference between the market value and consideration received for shares...

  3. Addition u/s 56(2)(viia) - purchase of shares at price more than its fair market value - The tribunal extensively reviewed the submissions and evidence presented,...

  4. Correct head of income - sale consideration received by the assessee from redemption of preference shares including the premium- capital income or income from other...

  5. Addition u/s 56 (2)(viib) - Valuation of shares - Faire Market Value (FMV) - the assessee has himself filed a valuation certificate before AO and accepted fair market...

  6. Taxability of share premium collected by assessee u/s.56(2)(viib) - fair market value of shares - when the assessee has substantiated share price to the satisfaction of...

  7. Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - income from other sources - share premium received by the assessee - discarding the DCF method of valuation of shares adopted by the assessee...

  8. Addition u/s 56(2)(viia) - shares received by the assessee company on account of amalgamation, for a price lower than the Fair Market Value (F.M.V) of the shares -...

  9. Addition u/s.56(2)(viib) - Determination of FMV of shares - Admittedly, provision of section 56(2)(viib) of the Act do not prescribe only one method for valuation of...

  10. Additions u/s 68 - share premium - The valuation report filed by the assessee support explanation of assessee that shares were issued at premium which were below the...

  11. Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Value of share premium received on allotment of 31248 shares - Valuation report obtained from the merchant bankers even they have issued a...

  12. Addition u/s 56(2)(viia) - taking fair market value of buy back of shares by assessee from its holding company a company incorporated in USA - the provisions of section...

  13. Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - allegation of Share premium received by assessee was in excess of Fair Market Value of shares - Method of valuation - AO can scrutinize the...

  14. Income from other sources - Addition u/s.56(2)(viib) - The revenue authorities cannot force the assessee to adopt particular method for valuing the fair market value of...

  15. Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Share Capital - excessive Share premium - closely held company - Rule 11UA - Assessee has failed to explain and justify issue of preference...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates