Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that u/r 11UA(2) of the Income Tax Rules, ...


Taxpayers Can Choose Valuation Method for Fair Market Value; Assessing Officers Cannot Challenge Chosen Method in Assessments.

November 15, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

The High Court held that u/r 11UA(2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, the assessee has the option to choose between the Net Asset Value method or the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method for computing the fair market value for the applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. Once the assessee exercises this option, the Assessing Officer cannot question the applicability or computation of the fair market value using the chosen method, even during regular assessment proceedings. The Assessing Officer cannot reopen the assessment merely because the valuation under one method is lower than the other method chosen by the assessee, as this does not constitute an escapement of income. The court opined that the Assessing Officer cannot assume jurisdiction to reopen the assessment to verify the veracity and computation under the DCF method on the ground that the assessee did not fulfill the projected growth in subsequent years, as no assessee can accurately predict future growth at the time of making projections.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's invocation of Section 56(2)(viib) read with Rule 11UA for determining the fair market value of unquoted...

  2. Income from other sources - Addition u/s.56(2)(viib) - The revenue authorities cannot force the assessee to adopt particular method for valuing the fair market value of...

  3. Excess premium charged on issue of shares u/s.56(2)(viib) - The value adopted by the Assessing Officer under net asset value method even though a prescribed method does...

  4. Addition u/s 56 (2)(viib) - Valuation of shares - Faire Market Value (FMV) - the assessee has himself filed a valuation certificate before AO and accepted fair market...

  5. Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - issue of shares at premium - Determination of fair market value - The very purpose of certification of DCF valuation by a merchant banker or...

  6. Addition under the head “Capital Gains” - Fair Market Value of the salable area - The method adopted by the Assessing Officer to compute Fair Market Value of salable...

  7. Addition applying the provisions of section 50C - Once the assessee has raised the objection against the adoption of deemed full value consideration in terms of section...

  8. Valuation of the shares offered for subscription - Determination of fair market value - Applicability of u/s 56(2)(viib) read along with Rule 11UA - Adoption of the Net...

  9. Addition u/s 56(2)(viia)(ii) - determination of fair market value of shares - Method of valuation - Addition towards difference between FMV and actual amount paid for...

  10. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for assessing Long Term Capital Gain on sale of land in Financial Year 2005-06. Assessing Officer (AO) adopted full value consideration...

  11. Valuation - the fair market value of the property is dependent on several factors which influence valuation and there is no scientific or straight jacket method to value...

  12. Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Method of valuation of shares - closely held company issues its shares at a premium - The tribunal sided with the assessee, affirming the FMV...

  13. TP Adjustment - Fair market value of share of ECL representing the ALP - the DCF Method could not be adopted in the facts and circumstances of the present case as the...

  14. Addition u/s 56(2)(viia) - purchase of shares at price more than its fair market value - The tribunal extensively reviewed the submissions and evidence presented,...

  15. The assessee purchased agricultural land whose stamp duty valuation was lower than the actual purchase consideration. The authorities sought to invoke section 56(2)(x)...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates