Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
FEMA - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty imposed on directors for contravening Export regulations ...


Directors Fined for Export Violations Under FEMA; Tribunal Orders Penalty Deposit Amid Lack of Recovery Efforts.

November 18, 2024

Case Laws     FEMA     AT

Penalty imposed on directors for contravening Export regulations under FEMA due to non-realization of export proceeds. No documentary evidence provided to support claims of efforts made to realize proceeds. Tribunal directed deposit of 10% penalty amount with bank guarantee for remaining 90% within 30 days. Legal suits withdrawn from Mumbai High Court and refiled in High Court of Justice, London. Company failed to realize export proceeds for US$ 9,03,000 negotiated through bank. RBI refused further extension and placed company under caution list restricting exports. No evidence of suit filed in London Court or direction from court to buyers to pay pending proceeds. Conduct of filing and withdrawing writ petition before Bombay High Court not considered reasonable step. Failure to show correspondence with Indian High Commission in London despite RBI directions. Appellants were directors responsible for company affairs during relevant period. Efforts to keep RBI informed and global recession faced by buyers noted. Contravention of FEMA provisions upheld, but penalty reduced to Rs. 2,00,000 each for appellants in the interest of justice.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The AT set aside penalties of Rs.4,00,000/- and Rs.6,00,000/- imposed on the appellant under FEMA. Despite allegations that the appellant assisted in preparing forged...

  2. Seeking permission to re-export of mobile phones - case of petitioner is that despite the payment of the redemption fine and the penalty amount, the goods have not been...

  3. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine and penalty for importing old clothing. Referring to a previous case, it upheld confiscation due to non-compliance but decreased...

  4. Offence under FEMA - enhancement of penalty. Export obligations not completed within prescribed period for 21 foreign remittances, constituting technical contravention....

  5. Customs Broker license revocation, security deposit forfeiture, and penalty imposition under Regulations 10(a), (d), (e), and (n) of CBLR challenged. Regulation 10(a)...

  6. The impact of imposing penalty and purpose of reduced penalty not fulfilled - deterring the appellant from repeating the offence - Continued violation of policy...

  7. Penalty imposed under FEMA for non-compliance with Paragraph 9(1)(B) of Schedule 1 to FEMA Regulations, 2000. Section 13 FEMA does not require intention for penalizing...

  8. Fiscal Penalty on nominee directors - failure to fulfill the export obligation under DEPB licenses - HC

  9. Appellant applied for rebate of Central Excise Duty by producing fake shipping bills, fraudulently availing rebate. Settlement Commission order stated no immunity...

  10. The CESTAT allowed the appeal against the imposition of redemption fine u/s 125 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that when the exported goods are unavailable,...

  11. Appellants challenged confiscation of containers, imposition of redemption fine, and penalty due to inordinate delay in adjudication. Tribunal found procedural lapse by...

  12. Appellate Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on licensed money exchanger for alleged illegal export of currency and import of gold. Observed no evidence of illegal...

  13. Legal issues regarding the recovery of IGST/customs duty, interest, redemption fine, and penalty in connection with imports made under the Advance Authorization scheme....

  14. The appeal challenges the revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed for alleged violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(n)...

  15. In a case involving the imposition of a redemption fine and penalty, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that when goods are allowed...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates