The application seeking direction to the liquidator to put on ...

Rejected resolution plan barred from halting asset auction due to principle of res judicata.

Case Laws Companies Law

November 22, 2024

The application seeking direction to the liquidator to put on hold the auction of the immovable asset of the Corporate Debtor and consider the proposal to sell the Corporate Debtor as a going concern was dismissed. The appellant's resolution plan was previously rejected, and the orders affirming the rejection were not challenged, attaining finality. The relief sought was barred by the principle of res judicata as it had already been denied by the NCLAT. The appellant relinquished the right to question the appointment of the liquidator or seek the requested relief due to the failure to challenge the rejection of the resolution plan. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The application seeking direction to the liquidator to put on ...

Rejected resolution plan barred from halting asset auction due to principle of res judicata.

Case Laws Companies Law

November 22, 2024

You may also like:

Challenge to an interim arbitral award u/s 31(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The key issues are: (1) whether the rejection of an application u/s 16...

Violation of res judicata principles u/s 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, suppression of relevant facts from the Committee of Creditors (CoC), discrepancy in...

The judgment addresses the applicability of Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) concerning the recovery of tax dues from the successful resolution...

Principle of res judicata – Constructive res judicata - if any issue or matter decided by the Court or Authority not having jurisdiction the principle of res judicata...

Claim of appellant rejected on the ground that Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC - right to claim consideration of claim again in third round - NOIDA’s status...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the Resolution Plan must provide for payment of Provident Fund and Gratuity dues in accordance with Section...

Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

Validity of Resolution Plan - Category A are those assets which are required for the Corporate Debtor for running the business and non-core assets are those assets which...

Non-compliance with submission of Performance Bank Guarantee by the Appellant as per the Request for Resolution Plan's clause obliging the Resolution Applicant to...

Approval of Resolution plan - There is no error in the consideration of the CoC of the Resolution Plan and the commercial wisdom of the CoC by approving the Resolution...

The court held that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) rightly considered and rejected the resolution plan submitted by M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. and approved the...

The High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan...

Demand of KGST when the resolution plan was approved - Jurisdiction and applicability of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) over statutory dues. The court...

The Supreme Court held that the Effective Date for implementing the Resolution Plan was achieved on 20.05.2022 as all Conditions Precedent were fulfilled. The...

The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

Quick Updates: