Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's ...


Pump supplier's insolvency claim rejected due to pre-existing dispute over quality.

November 29, 2024

Case Laws     IBC     AT

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's rejection of the Section 9 application filed by the Operational Creditor. The key points are: The Operational Creditor admitted to being unable to discharge obligations as per tender specifications, indicating a pre-existing dispute regarding the quality of pump sets supplied. The Adjudicating Authority correctly concluded that detailed inquiry into the pre-existing dispute was required, which is beyond its summary jurisdiction under IBC. Once plausibility of a pre-existing dispute is noticed, the Adjudicating Authority need not conduct further investigation. The Corporate Debtor's defence cannot be deemed moonshine or illusory. For such disputed operational debt, Section 9 proceedings cannot be initiated by the Operational Creditor. The Adjudicating Authority rightly rejected the application as conditions u/s 9 were not fulfilled. The Appellate Tribunal found no error in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Maintainability of application u/s 9 of IBC, 2016 for non-payment of dues arising from supply of manpower services hinges on existence of pre-existing dispute between...

  2. Pre-existing dispute regarding machine's performance and delayed delivery existed before demand notice. Respondent provided evidence of documented communication with...

  3. Pre-existing dispute between parties regarding inflated invoices issued by appellant's staff/employees for different project under same Master Service Agreement....

  4. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, addressed the admissibility of a section 9 application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process...

  5. The Adjudicating Authority rightly rejected the petition filed u/s 9 of the Code due to a pre-existing dispute between the parties. The Corporate Debtor raised a...

  6. Rejection of section 9 application - pre-existing dispute - The Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in holding that there is a pre-existing dispute. When the...

  7. CIRP - Rejection of Section 9 Application on the ground of pre-existing dispute - The dispute stemmed from services provided by the Operational Creditor to the Corporate...

  8. Initiation of CIRP - Operational Creditors - existence of pre-existing dispute or not - Careful reading of Section 8(2)(a) of the Code provides that the existence of...

  9. Corporate insolvency process - Corporate Debtor has failed to demonstrate that there was a pre-existing dispute in regard to quality and standard of goods supplied by...

  10. Existence of pre-existing dispute or not - Applicability of provision of Sales of Goods Act, 1930 - The delivery of the goods and the acceptance of the goods by use of...

  11. The Corporate Debtor admitted outstanding operational debt owed to the Operational Creditor, citing adverse cash flow as the reason for non-payment, without attributing...

  12. Initiation of CIRP - The Corporate Debtor is not to raise bogie of disputes but there has to be real substantial dispute. The existence of dispute when the Demand Notice...

  13. Initiation of CIRP - Pre-Existing Disputes - This Tribunal is of the considered view that there is a Pre-Existing Dispute and the aforenoted correspondence establishes...

  14. Initiation of CIRP - existence of debt and pre-existing dispute or not - When no action is initiated in respect of the said mismanagement, projecting the mismanagement...

  15. Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor failed to make repayment of its dues - pre-existing dispute or not - the disputed invoices were rightly sent to the respondent -...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates