Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2024 Year 2024 This

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the approval of the ...


NCLAT Upholds CoC's Use of Swiss Challenge Method in Resolution Plan, Dismissing Appeal as Meritless.

December 13, 2024

Case Laws     IBC     AT

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging the approval of the resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority. The key findings were: The adoption of the Swiss Challenge Method by the CoC for value maximization was an outcome of its commercial wisdom, which cannot be interfered with. The appellant's contention questioning the Swiss Challenge method lacked merit. The Resolution Professional (RP) conducted the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) fairly and transparently, providing equal opportunity to all resolution applicants. The CoC duly considered and evaluated the revised resolution plan of the successful resolution applicant (SRA) before approval. The appellant's claim of denial of effective participation in CoC meetings was unfounded. The Adjudicating Authority did not err in approving the SRA's resolution plan, as no grounds u/s 61(3) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) were established to interfere with the CoC's commercial decision. The NCLAT upheld the primacy of the CoC's commercial wisdom and found no irregularities in the CIRP conduct by the RP.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The NCLAT upheld the challenge process and negotiation process conducted by the Resolution Professional (RP) as per CIRP Regulations and Process Note. It held SRA...

  2. The NCLAT rejected the intervention application filed by the Appellant for approval of the Resolution Plan u/s 30 of the I&B Code. The Appellant was an unsuccessful...

  3. NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the rejection of a new resolution plan submission. The tribunal held that once a resolution plan is approved by the Committee of...

  4. Rejection of the appellant's proposal for settlement u/s 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the National Company Law...

  5. NCLAT ruled on NCLT's authority to modify resolution plans under IBC. Court held NCLT's powers do not extend to examining CoC's commercial wisdom or conducting...

  6. Objection to Resolution Plan submitted - categorization of the Appellant as ‘affected’ homebuyer - The Tribunal upheld the classification of homebuyers into 'affected'...

  7. Fresh consideration of resolution plan after a resolution approved by the CoC - Direction given by the NCLAT that Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to be...

  8. Rejection of valuation report obtained by the RP from its valuers - The NCLAT observed that, Resolution Professional appointed valuers for asset valuation under CIRP...

  9. Resolution plan approved by Committee of Creditors (CoC) with 97.54% vote share. Commercial wisdom of CoC in approving resolution plan not to be lightly interfered with....

  10. The appeals challenged the approval of Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd.'s Resolution Plan, alleging material irregularities by the Resolution Professional (RP) and...

  11. Rejection of application seeking consideration of his resolution plan submitted - Looking at the total circumstances of the case, including the views of joint lenders...

  12. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that there was no infirmity in the Adjudicating Authority's order rejecting the application to set aside the...

  13. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging a resolution plan approval, affirming that once all resolution applicants had submitted their final plans by the deadline, no...

  14. The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order approving the Resolution Plan, which was approved by the CoC with 70.07% voting share. The Appellant, a dissenting...

  15. Direction to COC to consider ineligibility of 3rd Respondent under Section 29A of I&B Code - as per the Provisions of Law, the COC has power to take a decision with...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates