The SC held that Respondent No. 1, a society registered to ...

Flyway Toll Fee Controversy: Commuter Rights Upheld Against Unilateral Concession.

December 23, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law SC

The SC held that Respondent No. 1, a society registered to promote welfare of NOIDA residents, had locus standi to file the writ petition challenging imposition of toll/user fees by NTBCL on DND Flyway. The delay was condoned as commuters trusted NOIDA to protect their interests initially. Judicial intervention was justified given the public interest involved. Selection of NTBCL without bidding violated Article 14. NOIDA lacked real choice in extending the concession period due to unreasonably escalated project cost calculated to make repayment impossible. NTBCL recovered project cost and profits through illegal toll/fees. No opinion on outdoor advertisement dues as it was outside the scope of appeal. The HC judgment restraining toll/fees was upheld.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The SC held that Respondent No. 1, a society registered to ...

Flyway Toll Fee Controversy: Commuter Rights Upheld Against Unilateral Concession.

December 23, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law SC

You may also like:

Depreciation on right to collect toll tax on road developed by the Assessee - The Tribunal recognized the right to collect toll on roads developed by the appellant as a...

Depreciation on the asset ‘Right to Collect Toll’ - he benefit of depreciation @25% on the intangible asset designated by the assessee as “Right to Collect Toll” allowed.

CBDT BURIES section 14A - Rule 8D CONTROVERSIES Finally, The Might is Right - Article

Disallowance on account of depreciation on the right to collect annuity on toll roads - Entire investment/finance for developing the infrastructure facility was borne by...

Depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii) in respect of its “right to collect toll” - the claim of the assessee towards depreciation under Sec.32(1)(ii) in respect of its intangible...

Depreciation on intangible asset being 'Right to collect toll" (HOT Assets) - the claim of the assessee towards depreciation under Sec.32(1)(ii) in respect of its...

Activity of collection of toll / fee - collection of tolls by the appellant is not considered as Business Auxiliary Service provided to NHAI - AT

The Appellate Tribunal held that the right to collect toll in a BOT project constitutes an intangible asset, allowing for depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Citing a...

Royalty paid by a mineral concession holder for mining concessions granted by the State is subject to GST levy. The constitutional validity of notifications issued by...

TCS u/s 206C - If no amount of toll fees is recovered by NHAI to be remitted to the consolidated fund of India or otherwise then naturally the impugned deposits of toll...

Classification of supply - composite supply of works contract - The subject Service order is for supply of Toll Management System (TMS) to be erected and commissioned,...

Income accrued in India - royalty and Fees for Technical Services - literary work - The grant of license to use the software cannot be construed as granting a right to...

Levy of GST on Transfer Fee - Assignment of leasehold rights on land - The activity of assignment is in the nature of agreeing to transfer one’s leasehold rights. It...

Valuation - inclusion of certain concession in the fees by way of their scholarship scheme - There is no sustainable reason to reject the scheme published by the...

The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the...

Quick Updates: