The HC held that even if an assessee commits an error, it can be ...

Revision authority must consider error made by assessee, not reject application outright.

December 26, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The HC held that even if an assessee commits an error, it can be examined u/s 264 of the Act, which has a wide scope. The revision authority cannot decline consideration merely because the assessee made a mistake. The HC found the reasons given for not entertaining the application u/s 264 unjustifiable. It held that the revision authority erred in rejecting the application without considering the applicable SRO values on the dates of agreement and registration, as claimed by the assessee. The HC allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter to the revision authority for fresh consideration in accordance with the law.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC held that even if an assessee commits an error, it can be ...

Revision authority must consider error made by assessee, not reject application outright.

December 26, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Initiation of CIRP - Period of Limitation - Exclusion of certain period - NCLT rejected the application - The Adjudicating Authority has committed error in rejecting the...

Prayer for direction for placing the Settlement Proposal submitted by the Appellant before the CoC for consideration - CoC unanimously decided to reject the proposal...

The High Court set aside the impugned order dated 02.02.2024 rejecting the Rectification Application filed by the petitioner. The court found that the order lacked...

The assessee's request for fixation of special rate of brand-rate drawback was rejected due to non-fulfilment of basic requirements and time limitation. The assessee...

Revision u/s 264 - penalty u/s 270A imposed - waiver of penalty u/s 270AA - The very fact that the indications were made that the matter fall within (a) and (c),...

The court examined whether the application filed by the State Bank of India against the personal guarantor u/s 95 was barred by limitation. It was held that even if no...

Initiation of re-assessment proceedings/revision - Jurisdiction - The only error that appears to have crept in the order of the appeal authority as has been confirmed by...

Rejection of an application filed u/s 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by the Appellant, where the State Bank of India (SBI) had initiated proceedings u/s...

Rejection of claims which are delayed - When an Application under Section 7 cannot be entertained for a debt, which is barred by time and is liable to be rejected, any...

Rectification of errors in filing GST Returns - The case involved errors made by the petitioner in their GST returns for the period July 2017, initially by incorrectly...

CIRP - default of the Corporate Debtor in paying the dues of Noida Authority - The Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in allowing Section 65 Applications...

Validity of order of NCLT admitting the application for CIRP - Although, pendency of winding-up petition before the High Court may not preclude filing of Section 7...

Revision u/s 263 - Revision based on Audit Objection - a mechanical exercise of revisionary powers u/s 263 by the Revisionary Authority by merely citing the Audit...

The Advance Ruling Authority (AAR) considered an application regarding the levy of GST under reverse charge mechanism on royalty payments. The AAR cited u/s 98(2) of the...

Section 7 application rejected as barred by Section 10A of IBC. Supreme Court held no bar in amending pleadings or filing additional documents u/s 7, but present case...

Quick Updates: