The AT upheld the adjudication order regarding contravention of ...

Software Firm Fined for Overpaying Royalties to Foreign Partners, Breaching Currency Rules.

December 28, 2024

Case Laws FEMA AT

The AT upheld the adjudication order regarding contravention of Section 5 of FEMA read with Rule 4 of FEMA (Current Account Transactions) Rules, 2000, for remitting royalty to overseas parties exceeding permissible limit of 5% on local sales. The respondents had filed CST returns and respective State Level Sales Tax Returns disclosing actual sale price for taxation purpose, duly considered by the adjudicating authority. The AT held that sale price only relates to consideration for transferring property in goods without abatement except as provided, rejecting the appellant's reliance on a case pertaining to calculation of net income and not net sale price. The AT was not convinced by the appellant's submissions in view of its observations.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The AT upheld the adjudication order regarding contravention of ...

Software Firm Fined for Overpaying Royalties to Foreign Partners, Breaching Currency Rules.

December 28, 2024

Case Laws FEMA AT

You may also like:

Taxability in the hands of partners v/s firm - transfer of capital asset by firm to partners - There is no merit in the arguments advanced by assessee, that transfer of...

DRI busted Foreign Currency Smuggling Racket involving Foreign Nationals; Foreign Currencies worth ₹ 6.14 crore seized

Smuggling - Absolute confiscation of foreign currency seized from the Appellant u/s 113(d),(e) & (h) of the Customs Act - The Tribunal found that there was only a venial...

Foreign Exchange Management (Foreign Currency Accounts by a person resident in India) (Amendment) Regulations, 2019

Confiscation of the currency seized - validity of order for release on payment of redemption fine - The High court found that the seizure and confiscation of foreign...

Imposition of penalty on partners - penalty on partner is not imposable when the firm is penalised under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

Vicarious liability of partner of the firm - separate identity of partnership firm - merely the petitioner running a firm, but it is not a legal entity and it cannot be...

Demand of service tax on partners services to partnership firm - separate identity - mutuality of services - there cannot be a service provider – service recipient...

Demand in respect of firm raised in the name of Partner - In the light of the legal nature of a partnership firm, a demand raised on the managing partner can never be...

Transfer of an industrial undertaking from urban to rural area by a partnership firm qualifies for exemption u/s 54G of the Income Tax Act. The assessee, a partner in...

Foreign Exchange Management (Foreign Currency Accounts by a person resident in India) Regulations, 2015 - Opening of Foreign Currency Accounts by Re-insurance and...

Treatment to Forex loss incurred by the assessee on account of derivative transactions as speculative transactions - When the assessee enters into a hedging transaction...

Short term capital gain - capital gain arose from transfer of land to the partnership firm by way of capital contribution as the assets was converted to Fixed Capital...

Status of assessee as "AOP" instead of "partnership firm" - The assessee firm was comprised of four individual partners who were representing their respective firms -...

The complaint of dishonour of cheque was challenged for lack of necessary averments against the partners. Partnership Act provisions establish partners' liability for...

Quick Updates: