Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and held that no penalty ...


Assessee not liable for penalty u/s 270A on service tax, PF contributions.

January 18, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and held that no penalty u/s 270A could be levied for non-payment of service tax liability and employees' contribution to PF before the due date. It was an admitted fact that both amounts were already available in the audit report, which formed the basis for disallowance by the AO. Following the Delhi High Court's decision in Prem Brothers Infrastructure LLP, it cannot be considered mis-reporting. The Supreme Court in Price Waterhouse Coopers (P.) Ltd. held that no penalty could be imposed for a mistake disclosed in the tax audit report. Since no adjustment was made in the intimation u/s 143(1), it was not a fit case for levying penalty u/s 270A.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  2. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  3. Enhancement of late fee/penalty levied u/s 70 of FA - only the persons who are liable to pay service tax, have to file the return on time else they are liable to pay...

  4. Imposition of penalty - intention to evade service tax - it is found that the contention of the appellant that they bona fidely believed that they are not liable to pay...

  5. Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

  6. When a service provider has already paid 100% service tax on manpower supply and security services, demanding the same service tax from the service recipient, who is...

  7. Penalty u/s 270A was imposed by disallowing 30% of indexed cost of development expenses concerning Long Term Capital Gain offered by the assessee due to failure to...

  8. immunity from imposing penalty u/s 270AA - Penalty u/s 270A for failure to file the return of income (ITR) - Under Section 270 AA of the Income Tax Act, immunity from...

  9. Once a service is subjected to service tax, the same service cannot be taxed again, as it would amount to double taxation, which is impermissible. In this case, even...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

  12. Classification of service - Management Maintenance or Repair Services or not - SCN is very vague - Out of total 16 work orders, the Appellant has rightly collected...

  13. Business Auxiliary Service - target incentives not liable to service tax - AT

  14. Business Auxiliary Services - Job work - ‘yamming process’ amount to manufacture - not liable to service tax - AT

  15. Services provided by Agent on behalf of AAI or airport liable to Service tax - SC

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates