ITAT set aside additions made under s.56(2)(x)(b) regarding ...

Tribunal Remands Case After Tax Authorities Failed to Address Assessee's Arguments on Property Valuation u/s 56(2)(x)(b).

January 25, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT set aside additions made under s.56(2)(x)(b) regarding alleged undervaluation of immovable properties purchased below stamp duty value. The Tribunal found both lower authorities passed non-speaking orders without addressing assessee's submissions or providing reasoned findings. CIT(A)'s order demonstrated lack of application of mind, seeking reasons for delayed registration without previously requesting such information from assessee. The rejection of assessee's explanation and invocation of s.56(2)(x) lacked substantive reasoning, violating principles of natural justice under audi alteram partem. Matter remanded to AO for fresh consideration with proper opportunity for assessee to present case.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT set aside additions made under s.56(2)(x)(b) regarding ...

Tribunal Remands Case After Tax Authorities Failed to Address Assessee's Arguments on Property Valuation u/s 56(2)(x)(b).

January 25, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The case pertains to the refund of service tax paid on input services utilized for the export of 'Cut and Polished Diamonds' during October 2015 to March 2016, as per...

The case pertains to the levy of interest u/s 234C for failure on the part of the payer to deduct tax deducted at source (TDS) u/ss 196D and 194LD. The key points are:...

Remand order issued in case concerning refund of accumulated input tax credit (ITC) for zero-rated supply due to mismatch in ITC as per GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B. Adjudicating...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of classifying services as either business auxiliary or legal services. The appellant provided Legal Consultancy...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Revocation of CHA License - appellant failed to verify the address at which the two clients operated and that requirement of ‘know your customer (KYC)’ was entirely...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of notice being sent to the wrong address, leading to an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) due to improper service. The CIT(A)...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the rejection of the assessee's claim for a lower tax rate u/s 115BAA due to non-filing of Form 10IC on time. The CIT(A) dismissed the...

Foreign tax credit claim for doubly taxed foreign sourced salary income was denied due to belated filing of Form No. 67. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim,...

Classification of exported goods - Abrasive Mesh - The Tribunal observed that the lower authorities failed to address the Appellant's submissions adequately....

Validity of remanding the matter to the Assessing Authority - the first appellate authority has adjudicated the controversy on merits and therefore, the tribunal, which...

The assessee claimed that the deductor had deducted tax but failed to deposit it with the Central Government, leading to a mismatch between tax credits claimed and...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of refund of excess taxes claimed by the Assessee due to a difference in the amount of TDS and Advance Tax as computed by the...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

Quick Updates: