Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside ...


Customs Tribunal Overturns Penalties in Zinc-Lead Import Case, Rules Supplier's Misdeclaration Was Genuine Error Without Duty Evasion

January 30, 2025

Case Laws     Customs     AT

CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside confiscation, redemption fine, and penalties in a case involving misdeclaration of imported zinc ingots as lead ingots. The Tribunal determined this was a bonafide mistake by the foreign supplier rather than intentional duty evasion, noting both items were freely importable with identical duty rates. The appellant would have gained no monetary benefit from the misdeclaration, as lead ingots were actually more expensive than zinc ingots. Given these circumstances and the absence of malafide intent, the Tribunal concluded that an incorrect declaration resulting from supplier error did not warrant punitive measures. The appeal was allowed, reversing the adjudicating authority's original order.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) case involving valuation of imported goods - rejection of declared value - enhancement of value. The tribunal...

  2. CENVAT Credit - additional duty of customs paid - In fact, Hindustan Zinc had paid additional duty of customs by availing the benefit under serial number 122A/123 of the...

  3. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  4. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 (a) and (b) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Abetment in mis-declaration of goods and evasion of duty - The appellants were accused of being...

  5. Levy of penalty for abetting in mis-declaration of imported goods - Revocation of Courier License - The tribunal ruled that penalty under this section could only be...

  6. CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

  7. Adjudication of a customs duty dispute involving the import of cars and the determination of the 'transaction value' u/s 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The key points are:...

  8. Revocation of Customs Broker License - Overvaluation and misdeclaration with intent to claim drawback under section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The tribunal acknowledged...

  9. The CESTAT Kolkata, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving a Customs Broker accused of illegal activities leading to the forfeiture of their security deposit...

  10. Valuation of imported goods - inclusion of royalty and the cost of advertisement incurred by the Appellant in India in assessable value - related party - The Tribunal...

  11. The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

  12. Confiscation - penalty - import of lead acid rechargeable batteries - import in the name of others IEC number - If the foreign supplier or Kolkata Customs officials had...

  13. Valuation of goods - old and used self-propelled platform supply vessel Sagar Fortune - The justification offered for invoking rule 12 of Customs Valuation...

  14. Valuation - Inclusion of expenditure incurred towards advertising, marketing and promotion of the goods - The Tribunal emphasized that for costs to be added to the...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of classifying imported Zinc as unwrought/unrefined under a specific customs tariff heading. The Tribunal rejected the demand...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates