HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging placement on Denied ...

Company Wins Challenge Against Blacklisting After Trade Authority Failed to Consider Detailed Representation Before Taking Action

February 5, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging placement on Denied Entity List by Director General of Foreign Trade. Court found authority's failure to consider petitioner's 11-page detailed representation dated 25.04.2016 before blacklisting was procedurally improper and legally untenable. Mandamus issued directing authorities to consider representation and remove petitioner from Denied Entity List. Court emphasized administrative obligation to evaluate substantive submissions before taking adverse action. Decision underscores principle of natural justice requiring fair consideration of representations before implementing prejudicial measures.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging placement on Denied ...

Company Wins Challenge Against Blacklisting After Trade Authority Failed to Consider Detailed Representation Before Taking Action

February 5, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Imposition of GST on trade payables - challenge on the ground that the impugned order travelled beyond the scope of the show cause notice and the entire trade payables...

Appointment of adjudicating authorities - only if similar show cause notices are issued to the same noticee by different adjudicating authorities, all such notices would...

Sub: Detailed Guidelines for Re-Testing of Samples- reg. - Trade Notice

- Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director - The Petitioner resigned from the Company on 05.02.2016. Therefore, as per the details regarding the Directors of...

The assessee, a professional stock broker, claimed loss on trading of shares which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds that the trades were not...

Challenge to the State GST authorities demanding input tax credit availed by the petitioner along with interest and penalty for IGST paid on manpower supply services...

Dishonor of Cheque - respondent accused was acquitted principally on the ground that the company was not properly represented - The power of attorney holder representing...

The adjudicating authority's superficial view on classifying the impugned goods under the SCOMET regime of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) is incorrect. The FTP is...

SCN issued for cancellation of registration without detailed reasons. Held: Respondent authorities' approach commendable for complying with natural justice by giving...

The HC quashed the order blacklisting the petitioner company for 3 years and debarring it from participating in future tenders by the Government of Tripura. Approving...

Prohibition on insider trading of securities - Section 195 of the Companies Act, 2013 omitted.

ATTENTION: All DIRECTORS of ANY COMPANY Updating of Income Tax PAN details in MCA21 DIN DATA

The respondent authority failed to provide reasons for levying interest and penalty, despite the goods being transferred between the petitioner's establishments, not...

The company failed to file financial statements and annual returns for five financial years from 2014 to 2018. Despite having assets worth Rs. 3 crores as of 2008, the...

Levy of penalty upon the Director of appellant’s company and upon Head of Finance and Accounts of the appellants’ company and upon the company itself - The SCN is held...

Quick Updates: