CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding service tax ...

Service Tax Liability on GTA Services Shifts to Recipients, Provider Not Responsible for Recipients' Tax Compliance

February 18, 2025

Case Laws Service Tax AT

CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding service tax liability on GTA services during 2008-2013. The Tribunal determined service tax liability shifted to service recipients (registered companies) as per notifications, and appellant was not responsible for recipients' tax compliance. Adjudicating authority erroneously confirmed tax demand without disputing appellant's documentary evidence showing tax liability transfer to consignors/consignees. Tribunal set aside main service tax demand and canceled penalties under Sections 76 and 78. Bad debt-related demands were dropped based on chartered accountant certification. Minor penalties for late return filing (Rs.14,200) and under Section 77 (Rs.10,000) were maintained. The ruling clarified GTA service provider's obligations and liability transfer mechanisms under service tax regime.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding service tax ...

Service Tax Liability on GTA Services Shifts to Recipients, Provider Not Responsible for Recipients' Tax Compliance

February 18, 2025

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Demand of Service Tax - Reverse charge mechanism - import of services - As such it is not the liability of service recipient but the liability of service provider which...

Liability of service recipient to pay (reimburse) service tax to the server provider - SC

Refund of service tax paid on GTA services - service tax was paid directly by the provider of services whereas it was the liability of the recipient under reverse charge...

The High Court held that the value of free diesel supplied by the service recipient to the Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service provider cannot be included in the...

CENVAT credit - Refund claim - input services - man power recruitment service and security service - Section 68 (2) is a special mechanism for shifting part liability to...

Service tax liability cannot be imposed twice on the same transaction. The appellant, as a service recipient, was required to pay 75% of the service tax under the...

GTA service - Service Tax liability is on the person paying the freight - Service provider did not pay the freight and therefore there is no tax liability on their part - AT

Once a service is subjected to service tax, the same service cannot be taxed again, as it would amount to double taxation, which is impermissible. In this case, even...

Liability of service tax on lease - there vests a legal right in the service provider to recover the amount of service tax from the recipient of the service, even if...

Demand of differential service tax - Provider of GTA service - Whether the recipient of services were liable to pay ST on reverse charge basis (RCM) - all the service...

Whether the service tax attributed to TDS deducted by the service tax recipient is refundable to the service provider? - Held No - TDS even if deductible by the service...

Exemption from service tax - Legal services - Notary services - The court affirms that legal services provided by individual advocates or firms of advocates are exempt...

GTA - transportation services rendered by other transporters as sub-contractors - Consignment note' for the transportation service, it is held that the Appellant is not...

Nature of transaction - Classification of services - Supply of Tangible Goods Services or GTA Services - the same transaction could not be levied to service tax both at...

Short payment of service tax on GTA services under reverse charge mechanism, reimbursement of expenses not liable to service tax. Appellant providing GTA services,...

Quick Updates: