Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2025 Year 2025 This

CESTAT ruled against the Revenue's allegation of clandestine ...


Discrepancies Between Tax Audit Report and ER-1 Returns Alone Cannot Establish Clandestine Manufacturing of Liquid Medicaments

March 10, 2025

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

CESTAT ruled against the Revenue's allegation of clandestine manufacture and removal of liquid medicaments based solely on discrepancies between Tax Audit Report (Form 3CD) and ER-1 Returns. Following precedent in Micky Metals Ltd. v. CCE, Bolpur, the Tribunal held that mere differences in figures without establishing parameters of clandestine activity are insufficient to sustain such serious charges. Furthermore, since the documents were in the public domain during the relevant period (2010-11 and 2011-12), the show cause notice issued on 29.04.2015 exceeded the normal limitation period. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for excise duty, interest, and penalties.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Clandestine Removal - It is found that time and again it is held by the judicial pronouncements that merely on the basis of difference in the figures of audit report and...

  2. CBDT extends due date for filing Income Tax Returns and Tax Audit Reports

  3. Rejection of rectification petition - turnover of the petitioner was erroneously reported in the GSTR 1 return - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's claim...

  4. Deduction claimed u/s 11(1)(a) - audit report was filed belatedly - in the assessment year under consideration, viz., AY 2015-16, the requirement under the Act was to...

  5. Central Excise Return New Form ER 1 for monthly return and ER 3 for quarterly return w.e.f 1.10.2011

  6. Penalty u/s 271B - assessee had failed to get his account audited u/s 44AB - The assessee explained that the delay in furnishing the Audit Report was due to the death of...

  7. Penalty u/s 271B - Assessee may have a view that prior to the date he was not required to file the audit report along with the return of income but obtain tax audit...

  8. Penalty levied u/s 271B - tax audit report - In our view, strained relationship with the earlier CA would constitute reasonable cause. The tax authorities have pointed...

  9. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  10. Impugned order set aside, matter remitted back to Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. Assessing Officer rejected claim based on Tax Audit Report not being duly...

  11. Levy of penalty u/s.271B - belated submission of tax audit report - Admittedly, tax audit report was filed alongwith return filed in response to show cause notice issued...

  12. Assessee's appeal allowed by ITAT against penalty u/s 271B for non-compliance with Section 44AB. Assessee demonstrated reasonable cause for failure to file return and...

  13. Levy of penalty u/s. 271B - default in furnishing of Tax Audit Report - In section 271B of the Act, the only requirement is to get the accounts of assessee audited or...

  14. Tribunal found assessee had reasonable cause for delay in furnishing Tax Audit Report due to delay in finalization of statutory audit arising from dispute between Board...

  15. The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates