The ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal, deleting the Rs. ...

Foreign Asset Disclosed in Revised Return by British Tax Resident: Penalty Under Black Money Act Section 43 Deleted

March 15, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal, deleting the Rs. 10,00,000/- penalty imposed under Section 43 of the Black Money Act. The Tribunal found that the appellant, a British citizen who was only a tax resident in India for the relevant assessment year, had disclosed the foreign asset in a timely filed revised return. The revenue authorities failed to establish that the appellant was previously an Indian citizen or that the foreign investment involved undisclosed income from India. Relying on K Mohammad Haris and Rohit Krishna precedents, the ITAT concluded that the legislative intent of the Black Money Act was not applicable in this case, as there was proper disclosure within the prescribed time limit.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal, deleting the Rs. ...

Foreign Asset Disclosed in Revised Return by British Tax Resident: Penalty Under Black Money Act Section 43 Deleted

March 15, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Sections 42 and 43 of the Black Money Act, 2015 impose penalties for failure to disclose foreign income and assets in ITRs by resident and ordinarily resident...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee, although not disclosing foreign investments in the prescribed Schedule FA of the income tax return, had...

Proposed amendment enables recovery of existing liabilities under Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 from seized assets...

The ITAT deleted penalties imposed under Sections 42 and 43 of the Black Money Act. Regarding Section 43 penalty for non-disclosure of foreign investments, the Tribunal...

The summary highlights the key difference between the scope of total income under the Income Tax Act and the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

The petitioner challenged the summoning order and sought quashing of the complaint u/ss 50 and 51 of the Black Money Act, 2015, alleging undisclosed foreign assets. The...

Addition towards undisclosed foreign assets under the provisions of Black Money (UFIA) And Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 for the alleged investment in life insurance...

The existing provisions of section 230(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, require obtaining a tax clearance certificate from income-tax authorities before leaving India,...

Validity of manual revised returns filed - scheme of demerger approved - scheme of arrangement approved by NCLT required Petitioner and Hind Lamps to file revised...

Validity of Proceedings u/s 144C - Eligible assessee - Original ITR filed declaring the status as "Resident" - In the revised ITR the status declared as "Non-Resident" -...

Section 3(1) of Black Money Act provides for taxation of undisclosed foreign assets in the year they came to notice of Assessing Officer. Assets acquired before Act's...

Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - Suo-moto declaration of undisclosed assets located outside India under section 59 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and...

HC ruled that Black Money Act proceedings cannot continue where income was declared and settled under Chapter XIX-A of Income Tax Act prior to Black Money Act...

Black money - Liability of the appellant to be assessed under the provisions of BMIT Act 2015 - Definition of undisclosed asset in the back money act clearly provides...

Quick Updates: