The HC upheld the reopening of assessment beyond the four-year ...

Double Deduction Claim Justifies Assessment Reopening Beyond Four-Year Limitation Under Section 147

March 15, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The HC upheld the reopening of assessment beyond the four-year limitation period, finding the appellant had claimed a deduction twice and failed to make full and true disclosure of material facts during original assessment proceedings. The AO correctly exercised jurisdiction under s. 147 after discovering the false claim. The court dismissed the writ appeal, noting that the appellant had already pursued alternate remedy by filing an appeal before the CIT(A) on the same issues after the writ petition's dismissal. The HC confirmed the appellant could address the merits of reopening before the CIT(A), rejecting the appellant's contention that no double claim existed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC upheld the reopening of assessment beyond the four-year ...

Double Deduction Claim Justifies Assessment Reopening Beyond Four-Year Limitation Under Section 147

March 15, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment notice beyond four-year period quashed. Assessee submitted complete details for section 80IA deduction claim with return. No failure to disclose...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

The assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IC for the finished products manufactured at Unit No. III at Paonta Sahib, Himachal Pradesh, was initially allowed but later...

Assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting assessee's return, which included export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation as other business income. Subsequently,...

Mere assertion of "failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts" does not confer jurisdiction for reopening assessment beyond four years. AO must demonstrate...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - there was tangible material before the AO to reopen the concluded assessment as the assessee is claiming huge...

The HC held that the reopening of assessment beyond four years was without jurisdiction as the reasons did not disclose any material facts that the assessee failed to...

Disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 10AA after claiming deduction / exemption u/s 10A - SEZ unit - As on the commencement of assessment year 2006-07, which is the...

Reopening of assessment - there was no negligence on the part of the assessee in furnishing the required details for completing the assessment. Thus reopening of the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - deemed dividend addition u/s 2(22)(e) - gap of more than four years - when the amount received by the two concerns from the loan giver...

The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reopening beyond the period of four years - Merely because while framing assessment for the subsequent year, the AO noticed certain...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reopening after expiry of four years - Original assessment have been passed under section 143(3) on Dated 14.12.2011 and A.O. recorded...

Validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147, the requirement of fresh tangible material for reopening assessment, and the disallowance of expenditure incurred on DAP,...

Validity of reopening of assessment - reopening beyond period of four years - reason to believe - Old regime - Once the primary facts are disclosed by the assessee, the...

Quick Updates: