The HC upheld the assessee's methodology for computing deduction ...

Proportionate Allocation Method Valid for Computing Section 36(1)(viii) Deduction When Eligible Business Expenses Not Separately Recorded

April 4, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The HC upheld the assessee's methodology for computing deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) of the I.T. Act. Since the assessee's accounts did not segregate actual expenditure for eligible business, the court approved the proportionate allocation method where the ratio of total income to total expenditure was applied to eligible business income to determine eligible business expenses. This approach was justified as the accounts showed gross income and expenditure for the entire business, as well as gross income for eligible business, but not specific expenditure for eligible business. The court confirmed that 20% of the resulting profit figure from eligible business qualified for deduction under Section 36(1)(viii).

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC upheld the assessee's methodology for computing deduction ...

Proportionate Allocation Method Valid for Computing Section 36(1)(viii) Deduction When Eligible Business Expenses Not Separately Recorded

April 4, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) - Whether assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) even though the assessee is not an eligible entity under the provisions of the Act...

Delay in employee contribution to P.F. - Disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) read with section 2(24)(x) - The onus is on the assessee to prove that it is eligible for deduction...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Revision u/s 263 - Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) - Insofar as, the second issue of excess allowances of deduction u/s.36 (1)(vii), the assessment order passed by the AO is...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the following issues: 1. Deduction u/s. 80P(1) r.w.s. 80P(2)(a)(i) - Held that the assessee is not a cooperative bank, making it...

Disallowance of bad debts as claimed u/s 36(1)(viia) - deduction claimed @10% of aggregate average advances - AO is directed to make relevant enquires and verifications...

Deduction claimed u/s 36(1)(viii) for interest income from housing finance for non-residential purposes was disallowed, excluding such amounts from computing eligible...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

The assessee claimed weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) for donation made to M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust at the end of the year. The...

Computation of deduction u/s 80IB/80IC - allocation of advertisement expenses to the eligible units in the ratio of turnover of eligible units to the total turnover of...

Deduction u/s 80IC - AO reallocated management fees and remuneration paid to managing director on gross profit basis. ITAT held allocation basis accepted by AO in past...

Method of communication of notice - The High Court examined the provisions of Section 282(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 127(1) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962...

Provision for bad and doubtful debts u/s 36(1)(viia) against the advances of rural branches - The circular mentions that the provisions of new clause (viia) of section...

Deduction u/s 36(1)(iii) - double deduction for deduction of interest - once these amounts are allowed as deduction in the year of incurring the expenditure, the same...

Deduction u/s 35(2AB) - Expenditure which was not eligible for weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) - scientific research and development expenditure - such R&D expenditure...

Quick Updates: