9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
Valuation of Cotton Shirts exported under DEPB Scheme. Analysis: In this appeal, the issue revolves around the valuation of Cotton Shirts exported under the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) Scheme by M/s. Dimension India. The Appellants declared a price of US $10.75 per piece for 100% Cotton Gents Shirts in the shipping bill. However, the Commissioner of Customs lowered the valuation to Rs. 65 per piece based on a market enquiry without disclosing the details of the enquiry to the Appellants. The Appellants argued that no evidence was presented to justify the reduced valuation and emphasized that they are obligated to declare a value not less than the export price as per relevant Acts. They contended that even if there was a misdeclaration, no duty should be imposed on them. The Respondent, on the other hand, argued that in DEPB Scheme exports, the present market value is crucial as the credit against the export product should not exceed 50% of the present market value. They maintained that the show cause notice was based on a market enquiry, which the Appellants failed to rebut. The Commissioner found the fabric quality to be poor and upheld the market enquiry valuation. The Respondent cited precedents to support the position that over-invoicing export consignments is an offense under the Customs Act. Upon considering the submissions, the Tribunal found merit in the Appellants' argument that they were not provided with the details of the market enquiry, depriving them of the chance to effectively challenge it. The Tribunal noted the lack of transparency regarding the conduct and findings of the market enquiry, which violated principles of natural justice. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision. The Tribunal directed the Authority to disclose the market enquiry report to the Appellants, allow them to make representations, and ensure adherence to principles of natural justice in the proceedings. In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal by remand, highlighting the importance of transparency, fairness, and adherence to procedural justice in matters of valuation under the DEPB Scheme.
|
