9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2001 (7) TMI 910 - AT - Central Excise
Issues:
1. Confirmation of duty demand and imposition of penalties under various provisions of Central Excise Rules. 2. Alleged clandestine manufacture and removal of fans. 3. Anomalies in the maintenance of Form IV register and discrepancies in duty paid goods. Analysis: 1. The judgment confirms the demand of duty and imposition of penalties on the Appellant under Rule 173Q(1)(a), Rule 173Q(1)(a) & (d), and Rule 226 of the Central Excise Rules. The authorities found discrepancies in the records related to the manufacture and removal of fans, leading to the confirmation of duty demand and penalties. 2. The Appellant was accused of clandestine manufacture and removal of fans. The authorities observed a shortage of finished items compared to the received pieces of fans impeller/moulding, indicating discrepancies. The Appellant's explanation regarding improper record maintenance due to inexperience was not deemed sufficient to disprove the allegations. Anomalies in the movement of roller assemblies further supported the conclusion of clandestine activities. 3. Serious anomalies were identified in the maintenance of Form IV register concerning duty paid goods received under Rule 173H. The discrepancies in recording the Sl. No. of returned fans and the total number of fans raised suspicions of manipulation of records by the Appellant to evade duty payment. The Revenue's conclusion of clandestine removal was based on these discrepancies and the lack of satisfactory explanations from the Appellant. 4. The Appellant's argument of mismanagement of records due to inexperienced staff was not accepted, considering the timeline of discrepancies extending beyond the establishment of the factory. The judgment emphasized that the discrepancies in records, coupled with unexplained input usage, supported the Revenue's findings of clandestine activities. While the duty demand was confirmed, the penalty amount was reduced, leading to the rejection of the appeal except for the modification in the penalty quantum.
|
