9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Taxation of dividend income received by a company post-amalgamation.
Analysis: 1. The case involved the taxation of dividend income received by an assessee-company post-amalgamation. The assessee argued that the dividend income received by the transferor-company, which was later amalgamated with the assessee-company, should not be taxed in the hands of the assessee. The Tribunal initially ruled against the assessee, leading to the reference to the High Court. 2. The High Court referred to a previous judgment involving a similar scenario where a company was amalgamated with another entity. In that case, the Court held that post-amalgamation, the transferor-company ceased to exist, and the dividend income received by it could not be taxed in the hands of the amalgamated entity. The Court emphasized that after amalgamation, the transferor-company could not declare dividends or distribute them to the shareholders. This precedent was deemed applicable to the current case. 3. The revenue, represented by Dr. V. Balasubramaniam, relied on a Supreme Court judgment where dividends declared by a company were later treated as loans due to legal issues. However, the High Court distinguished this case from the current scenario, highlighting that the amalgamation in this case occurred in the same previous year in which the dividend was declared, aligning it with the precedent mentioned earlier. 4. Ultimately, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the dividend income received by the transferor-company post-amalgamation should not be taxed in the hands of the assessee-company. The Court's decision was based on the legal principle established in the previous judgment and the timing of the amalgamation in relation to the dividend declaration. No costs were awarded in this judgment.
|
