9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Extension of time limit for serving show cause notice under Section 124 of the Customs Act. Analysis: The appeal was filed against an order extending the time limit for serving a show cause notice on the appellants under Section 124 of the Customs Act. The investigation revealed suspicion of over-valuation of 250 CDs containing software of jewelry design and mahendi arts sought to be exported. The appellants had previously exported identical CDs, leading to the seizure of relevant documents for investigation. The department suspected over-valuation and did not allow the export, prompting legal actions by the appellants. The High Court directed provisional export on bond execution. The department seized sale proceeds, leading to legal challenges by the appellants. Due to lengthy investigation, the department requested an extension of time under Section 110(2) of the Act, which was granted by the Commissioner until 19-3-2002. The appellants contended that the extension was not judiciously granted, citing relevant legal precedents. The department argued the validity of the extension order, emphasizing that notice was issued but no reply was received from the appellants. The Commissioner released seized currency on the appellants' request, leading to a dispute on the applicability of Section 110(2) and its proviso. The Tribunal noted the absence of seized goods, as the currency had been released provisionally. Despite the department's request, the Commissioner extended the time limit after thorough consideration of the case file and issuance of notice to the appellants. The Tribunal found no merit in the appeal, dismissing it. It concluded that the Commissioner had validly extended the time limit based on sufficient cause after detailed consideration of the case. The Tribunal emphasized that the Commissioner had not passed the order routinely but had applied his mind to the circumstances, issuing notice to the appellants for their response. The appellants' failure to respond adequately or seek an extension of time during the process contributed to the dismissal of their appeal. The Tribunal found the Commissioner's order well-founded and supported by detailed reasoning, rendering the cited legal precedents irrelevant in this case.
|
