2004 (11) TMI 51 - HC - Income Tax

Claim for deductions under sections 80J and 80HH - 1. Whether, Tribunal was legally correct in allowing the assessee s claim under sections 80J and 80HH? 2. Whether, in the absence of labour register and also the admitted fact that the mill was not registered under the Factories Act, the registration under the Factories Act, 1948, being obligatory if ten or more persons were employed, there was material with the Tribunal to hold that the assessee-firm satisfied the condition laid down in sections 80J(4)(iv) and 80HH(2)(iv) of the Act? - Both the questions are answered in the affirmative, i.e., against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.

Summary

Issues:
1. Interpretation of sections 80J and 80HH of the Income-tax Act for deduction claims.
2. Requirement of registration under the Factories Act for deductions under sections 80J and 80HH.

Analysis:
1. The High Court was tasked with deciding whether the Tribunal was legally correct in allowing the assessee's claim under sections 80J and 80HH of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1977-78. The respondent, a rice miller, had claimed deductions under these sections, which were initially disallowed by the Income-tax Officer but later allowed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and confirmed by the Tribunal. The Court, referring to a previous judgment involving similar circumstances, held that the processes from raw material purchase to finished goods sale constitute part of the manufacturing process, and the workers employed in these processes qualify as workers employed in manufacturing under sections 80J(4)(iv) and 80HH(2)(iv) of the Act. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision to allow the deductions was deemed legally correct, and question No. 1 was answered in the affirmative, favoring the assessee.

2. The Court was also required to determine whether registration under the Factories Act was necessary for claiming deductions under sections 80J and 80HH, especially in the absence of a labor register and non-registration of the mill under the Factories Act when ten or more persons were employed. Referring to a previous judgment, the Court clarified that the provisions of sections 80J and 80HH do not mandate industrial undertakings to be registered under the Factories Act to qualify for deductions. As such, the absence of registration under the Factories Act did not preclude the assessee-firm from satisfying the conditions laid down in sections 80J(4)(iv) and 80HH(2)(iv) of the Act. Consequently, question No. 2 was answered in favor of the assessee, against the Revenue. The Court affirmed that the deductions under sections 80J and 80HH were permissible without the requirement of registration under the Factories Act.