Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2004 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2004 (8) TMI 75 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Validity of assessment based on revised return
2. Interpretation of time limit for completion of assessments and reassessments under section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Issue 1: Validity of assessment based on revised return
The case involved a co-operative society assessed for the year 1974-75. The society filed its return of income under section 139(1) after the due date, showing income from various sources. Subsequently, a revised return was filed under section 139(5) claiming exemption under section 80P of the Act. The Assessing Officer disallowed the exemption but allowed a deduction under section 80P(2)(c), resulting in a revised total income. The Tribunal held that since the assessment was completed beyond two years, it was vitiated under law and quashed the assessment order. The High Court noted that the original return was filed under section 139(4) and the revised return was invalid. As per section 153(1) of the Act, an assessment order had to be made within two years from the end of the assessment year. The Tribunal's decision was set aside, and it was directed to reconsider the matter.

Issue 2: Interpretation of time limit under section 153 of the Act
The High Court analyzed section 153(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which sets the time limit for completion of assessments and reassessments. The section specifies different time frames based on the assessment year. The Court highlighted clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 153, which excludes a specific period when computing the limitation. In this case, the assessment order was passed after obtaining approval under section 144B of the Act. The Tribunal failed to consider the implications of clause (iv) of the Explanation, leading to an incorrect decision on the plea of limitation. The High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the matter in light of the observations made and returned the reference unanswered due to the Tribunal's oversight. The Court emphasized the need for a proper assessment of the time limit provisions for assessments and reassessments under the Act.

This detailed analysis of the judgment addresses the issues involved in the case, providing a comprehensive understanding of the legal reasoning and implications of the High Court's decision.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates