Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2004 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2004 (11) TMI 73 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Investment allowance under section 32A
2. Machinery employed by the assessee for investment allowance under section 32A(2)(b)
3. Disallowance under rule 3(c) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Amendment Rules, 1981
4. Carry forward of unabsorbed deficiency under section 80J
5. Relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Investment Allowance under Section 32A:
The Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) directing the Income-tax Officer to allow investment allowance under section 32A. However, the High Court, considering the decision of the apex court in a relevant case, ruled that the activity of construction of a dam does not qualify as the manufacture or production of an article, thus the firm is not entitled to investment allowance under section 32A. Consequently, the first two questions were answered in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.

Machinery Employed for Investment Allowance:
The Tribunal had to determine whether the machinery employed by the assessee entitled them to investment allowance under section 32A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, this issue was not addressed in the judgment provided.

Disallowance under Rule 3(c) of the Companies Deposit Rules:
Regarding the disallowance under rule 3(c) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Amendment Rules, 1981, the High Court found that the rule came into effect on April 1, 1981, after the accounting period of the applicant ended on September 30, 1980. As a result, the Tribunal was correct in allowing the amount of interest claimed by the applicant. Thus, Question No. 3 was answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.

Carry Forward of Unabsorbed Deficiency under Section 80J:
The Tribunal had to decide whether the assessee-company was entitled to carry forward the amounts of unabsorbed deficiency under section 80J from earlier years. However, this issue was not addressed in the judgment provided.

Relief under Section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
The Tribunal had to determine whether the assessee-company was entitled to relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, this issue was not addressed in the judgment provided.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates