Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2002 (1) TMI 1187 - AT - Central Excise
Issues:
1. Interpretation of Modvat credit and depreciation under the Income-tax Act. 2. Reconsideration of Modvat credit claim in light of the judgment by a co-ordinate Bench. Analysis: 1. The issue involved in the present case was the interpretation of Modvat credit and depreciation under the Income-tax Act. The appellants had not claimed depreciation on the Modvat credit they had taken up, and it was allowed after deducting the Modvat credit amount. The counsels argued that the revised returns filed excluding the Modvat amount, and accepted by the Income-tax Department, should not lead to disallowance of the Modvat credit merely because the return claimed depreciation on the total value. They relied on Rule 57R(5) and an amendment to Section 43(1) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal directed the Central Excise Commissioner to reconsider the provisions of the Income-tax Act and the accounting practices followed by the appellants. The matter was remanded for de novo consideration by the lower adjudicating authority. 2. The second issue revolved around the reconsideration of the Modvat credit claim in light of a judgment by a co-ordinate Bench. After hearing both sides, the Tribunal concluded that a fresh appreciation of facts was necessary in line with the previous judgment. The Tribunal reiterated that unless depreciation was allowed by the Income-tax Department, the credit should not be denied even if claimed in the return by the assessee. Therefore, both appeals were remanded back to the lower adjudicating authority for further examination. The authority was instructed to assess whether claiming depreciation on revenue expenditure under Section 32 of the Income-tax Act would hinder the Modvat credit claim, considering the relevant rules and amendments. The original authority was directed to reconsider the depreciation as contended by the counsels and allow the appeals by way of remand. In conclusion, the judgment focused on the correct interpretation of Modvat credit and depreciation under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the importance of allowing depreciation by the Income-tax Department before denying the credit to the assessee. The Tribunal's decision to remand the matter for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority highlighted the need for a thorough review of the facts in light of relevant legal provisions and previous judgments.
|